Short-term robustness of production management systems
AbstractShort-term performance of a production management system for make-to-stock factories may be quantified through the service rate per shift; long-term performance through the average monthly work in process (WIP). This may yield, for example, that WIP is minimized, while the probability of the service rate being higher than 95% still exceeds 0.90. By robustness the Japanese quality guru Taguchi meant that controllable factors (inputs) are selected such that good performance results, while the undesirable effects of environmental inputs are minimized. This paper, however, is the first to investigate robustness through risk analysis, which uses Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) to estimate the probabilities of specific system outputs for different environmental scenarios. To derive a confidence region for the resulting system performance, this paper uses bootstrapping. Short-term robustness is illustrated for a four-stage production line and several productioncontrol systems, namely Kanban, Conwip, Hybrid, and Generic. In this example, Hybrid turns out to be best. However, when risk is ignored, then Generic is best; so risk considerations do make a difference! The methodology can be easily applied to any practical production management situation, as it combines the standard techniques of simulation, heuristic optimization, risk analysis, and bootstrapping.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research in its series Discussion Paper with number 1998-070.
Date of creation: 1998
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://center.uvt.nl
robustness; risk; uncertainty; short-term; transient performance; production management;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
- D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Richard Broekman).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.