This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The price and volatility effects of stock option introductions : a reexamination

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Kabir, R. (Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research)
Abstract

The empirical evidence on the effect of options trading on the underlying stocks primarily comes from the United States. The existing literature is surveyed by Damodaran and Subrahmanyam (1992). They find a consistent evidence of positive excess returns with the introduction of call options and negative excess returns with the introduction of put options. They also find strong evidence of a decline of stock volatility after option listing. It is interesting to examine if markets other than the United States exhibit similar results. This paper, therefore, adds to the literature by examining data from the Dutch market. The paper is also distinct from prior studies in two more aspects: (a) both stock return and volatility effects are examined; and (b) three different samples - simultaneous listings of call and put options, call options alone, and put options alone - are separately investigated. In significant contrast to previous results, we find a decline in stock price associated with the introduction of options trading. The excess return in the 20-day pre-listing period (which also covers announcements of option introductions) amounts to a statistically significant -2.34%. We also observe a significantly negative price effect (-4.4%) during the post-listing period. The finding is robust to different methodologies or samples. In analyzing the effect on stock volatility, three different measures of volatility are examined over different time intervals. We could not find any significant effect of options listing on the volatility of the underlying stocks. This implies that stabilizing influences of equity options balance destabilizing effects. However, we find some support for the hypothesis that options are introduced for those stocks which, in the past, exhibited relatively higher volatility.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=3551
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research in its series Discussion Paper with number 37.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 1997
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:dgr:kubcen:199737

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://center.uvt.nl

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Corry Stuyts).

Related research
Keywords:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies
G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Brown, Stephen J. & Warner, Jerold B., 1985. "Using daily stock returns : The case of event studies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 3-31, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Conrad, Jennifer, 1989. " The Price Effect of Option Introduction," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 44(2), pages 487-98, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Raman Kumar & Atulya Sarin & Kuldeep Shastri, 1998. "The Impact of Options Trading on the Market Quality of the Underlying Security: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 53(2), pages 717-732, 04. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Detemple, J.B. & Jorion, P., 1989. "Option Listing And Stock Returns," Papers fb-_89-13, Columbia - Graduate School of Business.
  5. Elfakhani, Said & Chaudhury, Mohammed, 1995. "The volatility effect of option listing: Some Canadian evidence," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 97-116. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Damodaran, Aswath & Lim, Joseph, 1991. "The effects of option listing on the underlying stocks' return processes," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 647-664, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Stucki, Thomas & Wasserfallen, Walter, 1994. "Stock and option markets: the Swiss evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 881-893, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Fedenia, Mark & Grammatikos, Theoharry, 1992. "Options Trading and the Bid-Ask Spread of the Underlying Stocks," Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65(3), pages 335-51, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Sabrina Ecca & Michele Marchesi & Alessio Setzu, 2008. "Modeling and Simulation of an Artificial Stock Option Market," Computational Economics, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 37-53, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? There is a FAQ (frequently asked questions).

This page was last updated on 2009-11-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.