It takes two to quango: post-Soviet fiscal relations, political entrepreneurship and agencification from below
AbstractThe paper analyses the mushrooming growth of quasi-independent public agencies in the public sector of post-communist states. What at first glance seems to be a faithful transfer of institutions from the arsenal of New Public Management upon closer analysis turns into a very distinct phenomenon of post-communist transition. In the course of the 1990s, the amorphous public-private mix that was the Soviet political economy became increasingly differentiated as ex-apparatchiki turned political entrepreneurs branched out to create new commercial, collective, and even quasi-state regulatory bodies. The dividing lines between these new forms of organization, however, often remained quite blurry. This problem was further exacerbated by the severe underfunding of executive agencies that had become a notorious problem in post-Soviet countries. As a result, many agencies were forced to resort to private and semi-private sources of funding, and to commercialize their activities in order to support their official operations. In the second decade of transition, post-Soviet governments have increasingly been trying to control the worst such excesses through various forms of public management reform, such as the introduction of Single Treasury Accounts or various forms of revenue and expenditure audits. However, such efforts have met many setbacks and reversals; in some cases â€“ such as for instance in post-Rose Revolution Georgia â€“ the very new managerialist arsenal designed to enhance cost efficiency and separation between policy, regulatory and services tasks have instead with the governmentâ€™s tacit approval been used to camouflage continuing hybridization and ballooning public sector employment. In other cases, such as Russiaâ€™s, growing restrictions on one form of organization have simply stimulated a shift to different legal forms, in this case state unitary enterprises.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University (ISS), The Hague in its series ISS Working Papers - General Series with number 538.
Date of creation: 19 Apr 2012
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.iss.nl/
Georgia; New Public Management; Russia; agency reform; post-communist transition;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Ellman,Michael, 1989. "Socialist Planning," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521358668, October.
- Jack Diamond, 2002. "The new Russian budget system: Critical assessment and future reform agenda," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 2(3), pages 119-147.
- Henri Lorie, 2003. "Priorities for Further Fiscal Reforms in the Commonwealth of Independent States," IMF Working Papers 03/209, International Monetary Fund.
- Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Jameson Boex, 2000. "Budgeting and Fiscal Management in Transitional Economies," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0006, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
- Jack Diamond, 2003. "Budget System Reform in Transitional Economies : The Experience of Russia," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 39(1), pages 8-23, January.
- Dirk-Jan Kraan & Daniel Bergvall & Ian Hawkesworth & Valentina Kostyleva & Matthias Witt, 2008. "Budgeting in Russia," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 1-58.
- Jack Diamond, 2002. "The New Russian Budget System: A Critical Assessment and Future Reform Agenda," IMF Working Papers 02/21, International Monetary Fund.
- Allen Schick, 2002. "Agencies in search of principles," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 7-26.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lidwien Lamboo).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.