Unhealthy Paradoxes of Healthy Identities
AbstractComparative cross-cultural studies and identity research in social psychology focused onnational and organizational differences, clashes and dimensions (Hofstede, Barsoux &Schneider, Jackson, Ward, Bochner & Furnham, Capoza & Brown). Mapping cultural softwareof individuals and dynamics of small groups was supposed to provide additional managerialknowledge and skills indispensable for global expansion of stable organizational bureaucracies.However, social constructivists and critical social scientists have also exposed a contingentnature of managerial skills in complex and chaotic environments and demonstratedarbitrariness of sense-making in organizations (cf. Weick, Hatch). Increasing frequency ofindividual interactions and accelerated evolution of organizational forms drew attention ofresearch communities to the unhealthy (irrational, pathological) paradoxes of what used to beconsidered healthy organizational identities (Alvesson, de Vries, Gabriel, Carr). Problems ofidentity and identization (cf. Honneth, Sievers, van Riel) acquired growing significance viewedagainst the background of three paradoxes. First, managerial ideologies call for flexiblenetworks of empowered individuals, but managerialist ideologies tacitly support hierarchiccontrol. Second, there is no sustainable "fit" between new psychologized individualism andevolving "organizationalism" (Leinberger & Tucker). Robust identities and sustainable fit arecontinually challenged by unhealthy shadows of authoritarian "psychostructures" and dominantforms of organizationalism (Negri, Melucci, Stehr, Beck). Third, emergent alliances in social andmanagerial sciences have not succeeded yet in changing the methodological and ethicallandscape of research in order to challenge dominant modes of organizing, social embeddingand self-reflection. Such a shift could offer insights into the unhealthy paradoxes of healthyidentities assumed by functionalists and criticized by constructivists, contingency theoreticiansand evolutionists (Abrahamsson, Boje,Featherstone, Clark & Fincham, Denzin & Lincoln).
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam. in its series Research Paper with number ERS-2003-054-ORG.
Date of creation: 12 Sep 2003
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.erim.eur.nl/
identity; individualism; organizationalism; identization; qualitative paradigms;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2003-12-07 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ERIM Series Handler at the ERIM Office).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.