Kayande, U. Bruyn, A. de Lilien, G.L. Rangaswamy, A. Bruggen, G.H. van (Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), RSM Erasmus University)
Abstract
Model-based decision support systems (DSSs), designed to help decision-makers make better decisions, often do not help decision makers understand either how or why they work. As a result, there is likely to be a large gap between a manager’s mental model and the decision model embedded in the DSS. We suggest that this gap is an important reason for the poor subjective evaluations of DSSs, even when the DSSs have been shown to be of high objective quality, ultimately resulting in unexpectedly poor DSS adoption and usage. In this paper, we hypothesize that to increase its effectiveness, a DSS should not only be of high quality, but must also help reduce any mental model-DSS model gap. We evaluate two design characteristics that together lead users to update their mental models, resulting in better DSS evaluations: providing feedback on upside potential and providing suggestions for corrective actions. We hypothesize that, in tandem, these two types of feedback induce managers to update their mental models, a process we call deep learning, whereas individually, these two types of feedback will only have a small or negligible effect on deep learning. We validate our framework in an experimental setting, using a realistic DSS in a direct marketing context. We conclude with a discussion of both the theoretical and practical implications of our findings.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam. in its series Research Paper with number
ERS-2006-001-MKT Revision_Date: 2008-04-17.