"Not Only Defended But Also Applied" : The Perceived Absurdity of Bayesian Inference
AbstractThe missionary zeal of many Bayesians of old has been matched, in the other direction, by an attitude among some theoreticians that Bayesian methods were absurd—not merely misguided but obviously wrong in principle. We consider several examples, beginning with Feller's classic text on probability theory and continuing with more recent cases such as the perceived Bayesian nature of the so-called doomsday argument. We analyze in this note the intellectual background behind various misconceptions about Bayesian statistics, without aiming at a complete historical coverage of the reasons for this dismissal.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Paris Dauphine University in its series Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine with number 123456789/11069.
Date of creation: 2013
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published in American Statistician, 2013, Vol. 67, no. 1. pp. 1-5.Length: 4 pages
Laplace law of succession; Frequentist; Foundations; Doomsdsay argument;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Stephen Senn, 2011. "You May Believe You Are a Bayesian But You Are Probably Wrong," Rationality, Markets and Morals, Frankfurt School Verlag, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Frankfurt School Verlag, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, vol. 2(42), September.
- Peter Eibich & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2013.
"Examining the Structure of Spatial Health Effects in Germany Using Hierarchical Bayes Models,"
SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research
620, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
- Eibich, Peter & Ziebarth, Nicolas, 2013. "Examining the Structure of Spatial Health Effects using Hierarchical Bayes Models," Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79844, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alexandre Faure).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.