This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Forestry Dynamics : A Forest-Level Analysis Allowing for Continuous Planting and Harvesting

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Burton, P-S
Abstract

This paper presents a dynamic model of forestry in which the planner chooses the rates of harvest and planting at each instant.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Dalhousie, Department of Economics in its series Department of Economics at Dalhousie University working papers archive with number 96-01.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 27 pages
Date of creation: 1996
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:dal:wparch:96-01

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3J5
Phone: (902) 494-2026
Fax: (902) 494-6917
Email:
Web page: http://www.economics.dal.ca
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords: FORESTRY ECONOMIC MODELS

Find related papers by JEL classification:
Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Over five million full texts a year are downloaded through IDEAS.

This page was last updated on 2008-10-9.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.