We analyze the problem of fully implementing a social choice set in ex post equilibrium. Weidentify an ex post monotonicity condition that is necessary and -- in economic environments -- sufficient for full implementation in ex post equilibrium. We also identify an ex post monotonicityno veto condition that is sufficient. Ex post monotonicity is satisfied in all single crossing environments with strict ex post incentive constraints. In many economically significant environments, ex post implementation can be achieved in the direct mechanism. We show by means of two classic examples that ex post monotonicity does not imply nor is it implied by Maskin monotonicity (necessary and almost sufficient for complete information implementation). The single unit auction with interdependent valuations is shown to satisfy ex post monotonicity but not Maskin monotonicity. Ex post implementation in the direct mechanism is also possible in this case. We describe an example where the Pareto correspondence fails ex post monotonicity but Maskin monotonicity is satisfied.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Length: 62 pages Date of creation: Apr 2005 Date of revision: Publication status: Published in Games and Economic Behavior (2008), 63: 527-566 Handle: RePEc:cwl:cwldpp:1502
Find related papers by JEL classification: C79 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Other D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Philippe Jehiel & Moritz Meyer-ter-Vehn & Benny Moldovanu & William R. Zame, 2006.
"The Limits of ex post Implementation,"
Econometrica,
Econometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 585-610, 05.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Tatsuyoshi Saijo & Tomas Sjöström & Takehiko Yamato, 2004.
"Secure Implementation,"
Levine's Bibliography
122247000000000615, UCLA Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Tatsuyoshi Saijo & Tomas Sjostrom & Takehiko Yamato, 2005.
"Secure Implementation,"
Economics Working Papers
0056, Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science.
[Downloadable!]
Sjostrom, Tomas & Yamato, Takehiko & Saijo, Tatsuyoshi, 2007.
"Secure implementation,"
Theoretical Economics,
Society for Economic Theory, vol. 2(3), pages 203-229, September.
[Downloadable!]
Jackson, Matthew O, 1991.
"Bayesian Implementation,"
Econometrica,
Econometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 461-77, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Maskin, Eric & Sjostrom, Tomas, 2001.
"Implementation Theory,"
Working Papers
5-01-1, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Maskin, Eric & Sjostrom, Tomas, 2002.
"Implementation theory,"
Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare,
in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, pages 237-288
Elsevier.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)