IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ctw/wpaper/08134.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Analysis of Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration Awards

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Macun
  • Daniel Lopes
  • Paul Benjamin
  • Jonathan Gunthorpe

    (Cheadle, Thompson & Haysom Inc. Attorneys & University of Cape Town
    Director & Professor)

Abstract

This paper reports on research that involved the analysis of 873 Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) arbitration awards sampled from unfair dismissal and unfair labour practice cases for the years 2003 to 2005. The sample of awards was selected in proportion to the case load of each of the Provincial offices of the CCMA. This project follows an earlier study undertaken on the basis of the CCMA’s Case Management System and attempts, in part, to test the availability of information to assess the operation of the CCMA as a dispute resolution institution. Descriptive findings are presented in table format for each of the questions contained in the instrument that was used to capture information from the arbitration awards.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Macun & Daniel Lopes & Paul Benjamin & Jonathan Gunthorpe, 2008. "An Analysis of Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration Awards," Working Papers 08134, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctw:wpaper:08134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/7282
    File Function: First version, 2008
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    South Africa: arbritation awards; Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration;

    JEL classification:

    • A1 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctw:wpaper:08134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Waseema Petersen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dpuctza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.