IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cte/wsrepe/ws041406.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Model selection criteria and quadratic discrimination in ARMA and SETAR time series models

Author

Listed:
  • Galeano, Pedro
  • Peña, Daniel

Abstract

We show that analyzing model selection in ARMA time series models as a quadratic discrimination problem provides a unifying approach for deriving model selection criteria. Also this approach suggest a different definition of expected likelihood that the one proposed by Akaike. This approach leads to including a correction term in the criteria which does not modify their large sample performance but can produce significant improvement in the performance of the criteria in small samples. Thus we propose a family of criteria which generalizes the commonly used model selection criteria. These ideas can be extended to self exciting autoregressive models (SETAR) and we generalize the proposed approach for these non linear time series models. A Monte-Carlo study shows that this family improves the finite sample performance of criteria such as AIC, corrected AIC and BIC, for ARMA models, and AIC, corrected AIC, BIC and some cross-validation criteria for SETAR models. In particular, for small and medium sample size the frequency of selecting the true model improves for the consistent criteria and the root mean square error of prediction improves for the efficient criteria. These results are obtained for both linear ARMA models and SETAR models in which we assume that the threshold and the parameters are unknown.

Suggested Citation

  • Galeano, Pedro & Peña, Daniel, 2004. "Model selection criteria and quadratic discrimination in ARMA and SETAR time series models," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws041406, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
  • Handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:ws041406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/210/ws041406.pdf?sequence=1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. S. Wong & W. K. Li, 1998. "A note on the corrected Akaike information criterion for threshold autoregressive models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 113-124, January.
    2. McQuarrie, Allan & Shumway, Robert & Tsai, Chih-Ling, 1997. "The model selection criterion AICu," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 285-292, June.
    3. B. M. Pötscher, 1990. "Estimation Of Autoregressive Moving‐Average Order Given An Infinite Number Of Models And Approximation Of Spectral Densities," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 165-179, March.
    4. George Kapetanios, 2001. "Model Selection in Threshold Models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6), pages 733-754, November.
    5. van der Leeuw, Jan, 1994. "The covariance matrix of ARMA errors in closed form," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 397-405, August.
    6. Hirotugu Akaike, 1969. "Fitting autoregressive models for prediction," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 21(1), pages 243-247, December.
    7. Chow, Gregory C., 1981. "A comparison of the information and posterior probability criteria for model selection," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 21-33, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pena, Daniel & Rodriguez, Julio, 2005. "Detecting nonlinearity in time series by model selection criteria," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 731-748.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rinke Saskia & Sibbertsen Philipp, 2016. "Information criteria for nonlinear time series models," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(3), pages 325-341, June.
    2. Asghar, Zahid & Abid, Irum, 2007. "Performance of lag length selection criteria in three different situations," MPRA Paper 40042, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Nan Li & Simon S. Kwok, 2021. "Jointly determining the state dimension and lag order for Markov‐switching vector autoregressive models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 471-491, July.
    4. Eugene Canjels & Gauri Prakash-Canjels & Alan M. Taylor, 2004. "Measuring Market Integration: Foreign Exchange Arbitrage and the Gold Standard, 1879-1913," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 86(4), pages 868-882, November.
    5. Alonso Fernández, Andrés Modesto & Peña, Daniel & Romo, Juan, 2001. "Introducing model uncertainty in time series bootstrap," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws011409, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    6. Rinke, Saskia, 2016. "The Influence of Additive Outliers on the Performance of Information Criteria to Detect Nonlinearity," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-575, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    7. R. Scott Hacker & Abdulnasser Hatemi-J, 2021. "Model selection in time series analysis: using information criteria as an alternative to hypothesis testing," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 49(6), pages 1055-1075, September.
    8. Lee, Shyan-Yuan & Tsai, Chih-Ling, 1998. "Model selection for causal models: The global procedure with AICC and AICU," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 205-223.
    9. Galeano, Pedro & Peña, Daniel, 2007. "On the connection between model selection criteria and quadratic discrimination in ARMA time series models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(9), pages 896-900, May.
    10. Francesco Giordano & Marcella Niglio & Cosimo Damiano Vitale, 2023. "Linear approximation of the Threshold AutoRegressive model: an application to order estimation," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(1), pages 27-56, March.
    11. Campos, Eduardo Lima & Cysne, Rubens Penha, 2017. "A time-varying fiscal reaction function for Brazil," FGV EPGE Economics Working Papers (Ensaios Economicos da EPGE) 795, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil).
    12. Rodrigo Hakim das Neves, 2020. "Bitcoin pricing: impact of attractiveness variables," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Candelon, Bertrand & Lieb, Lenard, 2013. "Fiscal policy in good and bad times," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 2679-2694.
    14. Kathryn M. Dominguez, 1991. "Do Exchange Auctions Work? An Examination of the Bolivian Experience," NBER Working Papers 3683, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Pitarakis Jean-Yves, 2006. "Model Selection Uncertainty and Detection of Threshold Effects," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-30, March.
    16. Bin Liu & Weifeng Chen & Bo Li & Xiuping Liu, 2022. "Neural Subspace Learning for Surface Defect Detection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-16, November.
    17. George Kapetanios & James Mitchell & Yongcheol Shin, 2010. "A Nonlinear Panel Model of Cross-sectional Dependence," Working Papers 673, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    18. Sergey V. Smirnov & Nikolay V. Kondrashov & Anna V. Petronevich, 2017. "Dating Cyclical Turning Points for Russia: Formal Methods and Informal Choices," Journal of Business Cycle Research, Springer;Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys (CIRET), vol. 13(1), pages 53-73, May.
    19. Jacint Balaguer & Manuel Cantavella-Jorda, 2004. "Structural change in exports and economic growth: cointegration and causality analysis for Spain (1961-2000)," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 473-477.
    20. Fernandez, Carmen & Ley, Eduardo & Steel, Mark F. J., 2001. "Benchmark priors for Bayesian model averaging," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 381-427, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:ws041406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Poveda (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://portal.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/dpto_estadistica .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.