IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cte/werepe/6044.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bertrand competition, employment rationing and collusion through centralized negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Dhillon, Amrita
  • Petrakis, Emmanuel

Abstract

This paper studies the role of employment rationing in a unionized oligopolistic industry. Firms bargain collectively with an industry-wide union, and then compete in preces. Negotiations may be conducted over a bonus scheme which specifies the bonus that each employee receives if firm/industy profits exceed a certain target (or if industry employment does not exceed acertain level). After firmes have chosen prices, they request workers from the union to realize their production plans. The number that each firm actuallly receives depends on the union´s rationing scheme. Firms, by a suitable choice of a bonus scheme, can ensure a collusive outcome in equillibrium. Indeed, firms have ho incentive to deviate from the monopolu price knowing that they would be optimally rationed by the union.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhillon, Amrita & Petrakis, Emmanuel, 1997. "Bertrand competition, employment rationing and collusion through centralized negotiations," UC3M Working papers. Economics 6044, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
  • Handle: RePEc:cte:werepe:6044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/6044/we975627.PDF?sequence=1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dhillon, Amrita & Petrakis, Emmanuel, 2001. "Prot-Sharing, Bertrand Competition and Monopoly Unions: A Note," Economic Research Papers 269382, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Centralized negotiations;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cte:werepe:6044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Poveda (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.eco.uc3m.es/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.