IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/csi/report/01_003.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impediments to Best Practice in the Onkaparinga Catchment: A Review of Policies

Author

Abstract

Consultancy Report 1 for the Onkaparinga Catchment Water Management Board. This report considers the institutional framework which shapes the operating environment for the Onkaparinga Catchment Water Management Board. The report highlights some of the impediments to Best Practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Darla Hatton MacDonald, 2001. "Impediments to Best Practice in the Onkaparinga Catchment: A Review of Policies," Natural Resource Management Economics 01_003, Policy and Economic Research Unit, CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Handle: RePEc:csi:report:01_003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.clw.csiro.au/publications/consultancy/2001/Onk1BestPractice.pdf
    Download Restriction: none
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mike Young & Darla Hatton MacDonald, 2000. ""Who Dares Wins": Opportunities to improve water trading in the south-east of South Australia," Natural Resource Management Economics 00_002, Policy and Economic Research Unit, CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Australia; water; natural resource management; catchment;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General
      • Q1 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture
      • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csi:report:01_003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcia Sanderson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pecsiau.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.