Late again, whithout Monotonicity
AbstractMonotonicity is not necessary for the Wald ratio to identify a Local Average Treatment Effect. Under random assignment and exclusion restriction, if for every value of potential outcomes there are more compliers than defiers, the Wald ratio identifies the average treatment effect within a subpopulation of compliers. I use a simple Roy selection model to show that this "less defiers than compliers" condition is substantially weaker than monotonicity. It has two implications which are testable from the data, and it is closely related to those testable implications. Similarly, the local monotonicity condition in Huber & Mellace (2012) is not necessary for their identification results to hold and can also be replaced by a substantially weaker condition
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique in its series Working Papers with number 2012-12.
Date of creation: Jun 2012
Date of revision:
local average treatment effect; instrumental variable; monotonicity; local monotonicity; defiers;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
- C26 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Klein, T.J., 2008.
"Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: Instrumental Variables Without Monotonicity?,"
2008-45, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Klein, Tobias J., 2010. "Heterogeneous treatment effects: Instrumental variables without monotonicity?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 99-116, April.
- Klein, Tobias J., 2007. "Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: Instrumental Variables without Monotonicity?," IZA Discussion Papers 2738, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Clément De Chaisemartin & Xavier D'Haultfoeuille, 2012. "Late Again with Defiers," PSE Working Papers halshs-00699646, HAL.
- repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00699646 is not listed on IDEAS
- Abadie, Alberto, 2003. "Semiparametric instrumental variable estimation of treatment response models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 231-263, April.
- Huber, Martin & Mellace, Giovanni, 2012. "Relaxing monotonicity in the identification of local average treatment effects," Economics Working Paper Series 1212, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
- Rashmi Barua & Kevin Lang, 2009.
"School Entry, Educational Attainment and Quarter of Birth: A Cautionary Tale of LATE,"
NBER Working Papers
15236, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Kevin Lang & Rashmi Barua, 2010. "School Entry, Educational Attainment and Quarter of Birth: A Cautionary Tale of LATE," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series WP2010-019, Boston University - Department of Economics.
- Stefan Hoderlein & Yuya Sasaki, 2013.
"Outcome conditioned treatment effects,"
CeMMAP working papers
CWP39/13, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Florian Sallaberry).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.