This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Sex And 401(k) Plans

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Sheila Campbell () (Center for Retirement Research)
Alicia H. Munnell

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Over the past two decades, private pension coverage has shifted from defined benefit plans to 401(k) plans. This shift has many important implications for the retirement security of older Americans. One so-far-overlooked consequence is that it has changed the relative price of annuities for men and women. Annuities are financial instruments that guarantee retirees a lifetime stream of income in exchange for an initial premium payment. The reason for the change in the price is that annuities provided under the two types of plans are regulated by different legal regimes. Federal labor law covers annuities provided through defined benefit pension plans, and labor law requires equal pay for equal work. The Courts have interpreted this requirement to mean that a man and a woman with equal earnings histories should receive equal monthly pension benefits. Since women and men have different average life expectancies, they will receive different lifetime benefits. In contrast, 401(k) plans do not generally offer annuities; they provide lump-sum payments at retirement.1 Retirees who want to annuitize the lump sums must take the money to an insurance company, which will sell them a single premium individual annuity (SPIA). Insurance companies, which are regulated by state insurance law, will provide smaller benefits to women and larger benefits to men than would defined benefit plans. Since women live longer than men do on average, men and women as groups will receive equal lifetime benefits.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.bc.edu/centers/crr/facts/jtf_4.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found (http://www.bc.edu/centers/crr/facts/jtf_4.pdf [302 Found]--> http://crr.bc.edu//facts/jtf_4.pdf). If this is indeed the case, please notify (Christopher F Baum)
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Center for Retirement Research in its series Just the Facts with number jtf-4.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 28 Mar 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:crr:jusfac:jtf-4

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 550 Fulton Hall, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
Phone: (617) 552-1762
Fax: (617) 552-1750
Email:
Web page: http://www.bc.edu/centers/crr/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? The RePEc project started in 1997. Its precursor, NetEc, dates back to 1993.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-21.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.