This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Can Faster Growth Save Social Security?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Rudolph G. Penner () (Center for Retirement Research at Boston College)
Abstract

Numerous commissions, individual researchers, and the Trustees of the Social Security system agree that the current Social Security system is not sustainable. The 2003 Trustees' report forecasts that the programís two trust funds (Old Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance) will be empty in 2042. After 2042, Social Security taxes would only cover about 70 percent of projected benefit costs. Even before the trust funds are exhausted, the combination of rapidly growing Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid spending is likely to create intolerable budget pressures that will force major changes in policy. The problem lies in demography. The economic burden imposed by these pay-as-you-go programs depends on the number of beneficiaries and the level of benefits that they have been promised. The economic resources available to the programs depend on the number of taxpayers and their ability and willingness to pay taxes. The population of elderly beneficiaries will soar in the future because of increased life expectancy and the retirement of baby boomers ó the first boomers will apply for Social Security pensions in 2008. Meanwhile, the population of workers paying payroll taxes will stagnate because of low birth rates experienced since the early 1960s. Although there is a broad consensus that the Social Security system is in trouble, a few dissenters argue that the Trustees are too pessimistic about future economic growth. The dissenters believe that a more realistic growth assumption would allow the trust funds to remain financially sound far longer than now expected. This brief will examine the implications of more rapid economic growth for Social Security and the federal budget as a whole, including a discussion of both the direct and indirect effects of growth.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.bc.edu/centers/crr/issues/ib_15.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found (http://www.bc.edu/centers/crr/issues/ib_15.pdf [302 Found]--> http://crr.bc.edu//issues/ib_15.pdf). If this is indeed the case, please notify (Christopher F Baum)
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Center for Retirement Research in its series Issues in Brief with number ib_15.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 25 Feb 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib_15

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 550 Fulton Hall, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
Phone: (617) 552-1762
Fax: (617) 552-1750
Email:
Web page: http://www.bc.edu/centers/crr/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Over five million full texts a year are downloaded through IDEAS.

This page was last updated on 2008-7-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.