This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Empirical Regularity Suggests Retirement Risks

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Luke Delorme () (Center for Retirement Research)
Alicia H. Munnell () (Center for Retirement Research)
Anthony Webb () (Center for Retirement Research)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Baby boomers have often been characterized as a generation in love with consumption and incapable of accumulating assets for a rainy day — or retirement. But you couldn't tell from the data. The Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), the Federal Reserve's comprehensive survey of household wealth in the United States, shows that the boomers have been accumulating wealth at much the same pace as the cohorts ahead of them. From 1983 through 2001, the period during which the surveys were conducted, the ratio of wealth to income has remained virtually unchanged at any given age. At first glance, this regularity seems comforting, suggesting that the boomers and the cohorts that follow are as well prepared for retirement as their parents. But that conclusion is wrong. For while the boomers have been accumulating wealth at much the same pace as their parents, the world has changed in four important ways: 1) the prevalence of defined benefit pension plans — an asset not included in the definition of wealth in the SCF — has declined dramatically over the last 20 years; 2) interest rates have fallen significantly, so a given amount of wealth will now produce less retirement income; 3) life expectancy has increased, so accumulated assets must support a longer period of retirement, and; 4) health care costs have risen substantially and show signs of further increase, indicating a need for greater accumulation of retirement assets. This brief presents the data from the seven Surveys of Consumer Finances conducted between 1983 and 2001, and then discusses why each of the factors listed above — the decline in defined benefit pensions, the drop in rates of return on capital, the increase in life expectancy, and the rise in health care costs — all require an increase in the wealth-to-income ratio to produce a comparable standard of living in retirement. In other words, the constant wealth-to-income ratios suggest a deterioration in retirement readiness.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/images/stories/Briefs/ib_41.pdf
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Center for Retirement Research in its series Issues in Brief with number ib41.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 12 Jun 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib41

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 550 Fulton Hall, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
Phone: (617) 552-1762
Fax: (617) 552-1750
Email:
Web page: http://www.bc.edu/centers/crr/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F Baum).

Related research
Keywords: at risk; baby boomers; retirement; pensions; consumer finance survey;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? The RePEc project started in 1997. Its precursor, NetEc, dates back to 1993.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-14.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.