IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib2013-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Do Employers’ 401(k) Mutual Fund Selections Affect Performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Edwin J. Elton
  • Martin J. Gruber
  • Christopher R. Blake

Abstract

Defined contribution plans, predominantly 401(k)s, are the primary source of personal retirement savings for American workers, making the investment decisions within these accounts a salient policy concern. These decisions are a result of two separate actions: the mutual fund options selected by the employer’s plan administrator and the specific funds chosen by the participant. While considerable research has examined 401(k) participant decisions in isolation, surprisingly little attention has been focused on the choices made by plan administrators. The administrator’s role is clearly influential, particularly if, as indicated by prior research, 401(k) participants themselves do not make good choices. This brief, based on a prior study, addresses this research gap by focusing on the fund choices of 401(k) plan administrators and participants’ reactions to these choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Edwin J. Elton & Martin J. Gruber & Christopher R. Blake, 2013. "How Do Employers’ 401(k) Mutual Fund Selections Affect Performance?," Issues in Brief ib2013-1, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2013-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/briefs/how-do-employers%E2%80%99-401k-mutual-fund-selections-affect-performance/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2013-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.