Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

How Do Employers’ 401(k) Mutual Fund Selections Affect Performance?

Contents:

Author Info

  • Edwin J. Elton
  • Martin J. Gruber
  • Christopher R. Blake
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Defined contribution plans, predominantly 401(k)s, are the primary source of personal retirement savings for American workers, making the investment decisions within these accounts a salient policy concern. These decisions are a result of two separate actions: the mutual fund options selected by the employer’s plan administrator and the specific funds chosen by the participant. While considerable research has examined 401(k) participant decisions in isolation, surprisingly little attention has been focused on the choices made by plan administrators. The administrator’s role is clearly influential, particularly if, as indicated by prior research, 401(k) participants themselves do not make good choices. This brief, based on a prior study, addresses this research gap by focusing on the fund choices of 401(k) plan administrators and participants’ reactions to these choices.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/briefs/how-do-employers%E2%80%99-401k-mutual-fund-selections-affect-performance/
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Center for Retirement Research in its series Issues in Brief with number ib2013-1.

    as in new window
    Length: 7 pages
    Date of creation: Jan 2013
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2013-1

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Hovey House, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
    Phone: (617) 552-1762
    Fax: (617) 552-0191
    Email:
    Web page: http://crr.bc.edu/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2013-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amy Grzybowski) or (Christopher F Baum).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.