Estimating Pension Coverage Using Different Data Sets
Abstract
Employer-provided pensions are an essential piece of the U.S. retirement income system. Calculating the percent of individuals covered by and participating in such plans as well as analyzing the changing nature of those plans is becoming an increasingly important exercise. A variety of data sets are available to estimate pension coverage and participation. Since deciding which data set to use is often not obvious, this Issue in Brief will examine five of them: the U.S. Department of Labor Form 5500 series, the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), the Current Population Survey (CPS), the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), and the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF). The brief will describe the strengths and limitations of each data set and compare pension participation rates derived from each set.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.Bibliographic Info
Paper provided by Center for Retirement Research in its series Issues in Brief with number ib2006-51.
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Length: 10 pages
Date of creation: Aug 2006
Date of revision:
Aug 2006
Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2006-51
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Hovey House, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
Phone: (617) 552-1762
Fax: (617) 552-0191
Email:
Web page: http://crr.bc.edu/
More information through EDIRC
For corrections or technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Amy Grzybowski) or (Christopher F Baum).
Related research
Keywords: employer-provided pensions; measuring pension coverage; participation; data sets; different; analysis;This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2007-08-08 (All new papers)
References
References listed on IDEASPlease report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Marric Buessing & Mauricio Soto, 2006.
"The State Of Private Pensions: Current 5500 Data,"
Issues in Brief
ib42, Center for Retirement Research.
- Marric Buessing & Mauricio Soto, 2006. "The State of Private Pensions: Current 5500 Data," Issues in Brief ib2006-42, Center for Retirement Research, revised Feb 2006.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.Cited by:
- James Poterba & Steven Venti & David A. Wise, 2007. "The Changing Landscape of Pensions in the United States," NBER Working Papers 13381, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2006-51For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amy Grzybowski) or (Christopher F Baum).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

