IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/crrwps/wp2015-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Calculating Neutral Increases in Retirement Age by Socioeconomic Status

Author

Listed:
  • Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher
  • Anthony Webb
  • Candace M. Cosgrove
  • Natalia S. Orlova

Abstract

As the gap between retirement resources and needs grows, many researchers have prescribed the antidote of working longer. But this prescription may disadvantage lower socioeconomic status (SES) households because they have shorter lives than higher-SES households, and working longer may increase existing disparities in retirement durations. This paper uses data from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study to quantity these disparities by SES since 1979, using education as a proxy for SES. The paper finds that age-65 life expectancies have increased for all levels of educational attainment but that the gains have been much greater for those in the top quartile. The paper uses these calculations to determine hypothetical retirement ages that hold constant for each SES group the 1979 ratios of time spent in retirement to time spent working. The findings suggest that all educational groups can work longer today than in the past, while spending a similar fraction of their lives in retirement; those in the top quartile of educational attainment can work a full one to two years longer than those in the bottom quartile and still maintain their 1979 ratios.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher & Anthony Webb & Candace M. Cosgrove & Natalia S. Orlova, 2015. "Calculating Neutral Increases in Retirement Age by Socioeconomic Status," Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College wp2015-21, Center for Retirement Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2015-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/working-papers/calculating-neutral-increases-in-retirement-age-by-socioeconomic-status/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pestieau, Pierre & Racionero, Maria, 2016. "Harsh occupations, life expectancy and social security," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 194-202.
    2. Wei Sun & Teresa Ghilarducci & Michael Papadopoulos & Anthony Webb, 2019. "The Impact of a Social Security Proposal for "Catch-Up" Contributions," SCEPA working paper series. 2019-03, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    3. Anca-Stefania Jijiie & Jennifer Alonso Garcia & Séverine Arnold (-Gaille), 2019. "Mortality by socio-economic class and its impact on the retirement schemes: How to render the systems fairer?," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/300032, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Yassmin Ali & Ming Fang & Pablo A. Arrutia Sota & Stephen Taylor & Xun Wang, 2019. "Social Security Benefit Valuation, Risk, and Optimal Retirement," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-31, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2015-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.