This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

A Comparative Analysis of the Costs of Italian Individual Pension Plans

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Elsa Fornero () (Department of Economics, University of Turin and Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, Turin)
Carolina Fugazza () (Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, Turin)
Giacomo Ponzetto (Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, Turin)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This paper analyzes the costs of third-pillar individual pension plans currently available in Italy, namely pension insurance policies and open pension funds, which are new products in the Italian savings market. For lack of data on annuities, the analysis is limited to the accumulation phase. To evaluate costs, we use different simulation scenarios, changing the length of the contribution period and the gross returns attainable on financial markets; we also consider participants with different life income and contribution profiles. Following international literature, we present cost measures which reflect the reduction in both the final accumulated pension wealth and the annual rate of return. The main result of our analysis is the existence of a substantial dichotomy in the market. On one side, open pension funds have moderate costs, close to those of voluntary pension plans in other countries and also to those of the Italian occupational pension funds (i.e. the second pillar). On the other, individual insurance policies are burdened by significantly higher charges. We consider different possible rationales for these costs, including the fact that the market is at a very early stage of development, without reaching a completely satisfactory explanation. Finally, we also study the possible regressive feature of the fee structure and the unfavourable treatment of early withdrawals of private pension assets; we conclude that both are indeed present in the majority of products, but that their impact is fairly limited.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://cerp.unito.it/index.php/en/publications/working-papers/114-a-comparative-analysis-of-the-costs-of-italian-individual-pension-plans
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Silvia Maero)
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, Turin (Italy) in its series CeRP Working Papers with number 33.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 31 pages
Date of creation: Feb 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:crp:wpaper:33

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Via Real Collegio 30, 10024 Moncalieri (TO)
Phone: 39 011 6705040
Fax: +39 011 6705042
Email:
Web page: http://cerp.unito.it
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Silvia Maero).

Related research
Keywords: Pension funds;

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? To receive notification of recent additions to the database, subscribe to the free NEP reports.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-16.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.