Compulsory Non-binding ADR
AbstractThis article focuses on compulsory non-binding ADR when third parties have reputation concerns that make them dislike their decision be rejected by the adversary parties who in this event decide to insist on a court verdict. The third party is assumed to trade-off deviations from her favored decision and the possibility that her recommendation might be rejected by the parties. Given that non binding ADR takes place in the shadow of a court verdict, the third party's award might be diverted from her preferred outcome in the direction of the likely court ruling.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by CRESE in its series Working Papers with number 2013-07.
Length: 18 pages
Date of creation: Oct 2013
Date of revision:
litigation; non-binding; arbitration; reputation; Alternative Dispute Resolution.;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- K31 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Labor Law
- K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Denis Jeanney).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.