This paper proposes a dynamic risk-based model that captures the high expected returns on value stocks relative to growth stocks, and the failure of the capital asset pricing model to explain these expected returns. To model the difference between value and growth stocks, we introduce a cross-section of long-lived firms distinguished by the timing of their cash flows. Firms with cash flows weighted more to the future have high price ratios, while firms with cash flows weighted more to the present have low price ratios. We model how investors perceive the risks of these cash flows by specifying a stochastic discount factor for the economy. The stochastic discount factor implies that shocks to aggregate dividends are priced, but that shocks to the time-varying price of risk are not. As long-horizon equity, growth stocks co-vary more with this time-varying price of risk than value stocks, which co-vary more with shocks to cash flows. When the model is calibrated to explain aggregate stock market behaviour, we find that it can also account for the observed value premium, the high Sharpe ratios on value stocks relative to growth stocks, and the out-performance of value (and underperformance of growth) relative to the CAPM.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers in its series CEPR Discussion Papers with number
4921.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
John H. Cochrane, 1999.
"New Facts in Finance,"
CRSP working papers
490, Center for Research in Security Prices, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.
[Downloadable!]
John Y. Campbell & Tuomo Vuolteenaho, 2003.
"Bad Beta, Good Beta,"
NBER Working Papers
9509, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
John Y. Campbell & Tuomo Vuolteenaho, 2004.
"Bad Beta, Good Beta,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 94(5), pages 1249-1275, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Lu Zhang, 2005.
"The Value Premium,"
Journal of Finance,
American Finance Association, vol. 60(1), pages 67-103, 02.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Tano Santos & Pietro Veronesi, 2004.
"Conditional Betas,"
NBER Working Papers
10413, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)