We show that in order to determine whether one decision-maker is more risk averse than another, it is sufficient to consider their attitudes towards a given two-parameter family of risks. When all risks belong to this family, useful comparisons of risk aversion can be made even in situations of ‘background risk’. Since expected utility becomes a function of mean and standard deviation, risk aversion can be measured by the marginal rate of substitution between mean and standard deviation. A utility function exhibits decreasing risk aversion if, and only if, this slope is a decreasing function of the mean. Second, we use the concept of prudence to solve a long-standing problem in mean-variance analysis: what is the economic interpretation of the concavity of a utility function which is a function of mean and variance? We show that in the case of normal distributions, utility is concave as a function of variance and mean if, and only if, it exhibits decreasing prudence.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers in its series CEPR Discussion Papers with number
1650.
Find related papers by JEL classification: D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)