Two literatures in political economy argue that differences in political institutions help explain variation in the fiscal performance of countries. They indentify electoral systems and institutions that structure the formation of the budget as important determinants of the budget deficit. In this paper we indicate that these two arguments complement one another. Electoral institutions matter because they restrict the type of budgetary institution a state has at its disposal to solve the coordination problem involved in the budget negotiations. The theory and the empirical results indicate a strong relationship between one-party governments and strong finance minister solutions on the one hand, and multi-party or minority governments and the use of formal budget targets on the other. Pooled time series regression supports our contention that the presence of one of these budgetary institutions matters more than the plurality/proportional respresentations dichotomy.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers in its series CEPR Discussion Papers with number
1555.
Find related papers by JEL classification: H60 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - General H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems H62 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Deficit; Surplus K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Karl-Martin Ehrhart & Roy Gardner & Juergen von Hagen & Claudia Keser, 2006.
"Budget Processes: Theory and Experimental Evidence,"
Caepr Working Papers
2006-009, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Economics Department, Indiana University Bloomington.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Karl-Martin Ehrhart & Roy Gardner & Jürgen von Hagen & Claudia Keser, 2006.
"Budget Processes: Theory and Experimental Evidence,"
Discussion Papers
146, SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
[Downloadable!]