Can European economics become Òthe most dynamic and competitive in the worldÓ? Using readily accessible data, the paper documents the following aspects: (i) today, the US outperform Europe by a factor of the order of 3, with no clear trend; the Lisbon goal is not in sight; (ii) Europe is not homogeneous; the UK and the small countries in North-central Europe outperform signiÞcantly the Big 4 continental countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain); the Big 4 should accept English as the lingua franca of economics, and implement ma jor institutional reforms; (iii) some 30 leading economics departments ( ten from each of these three areas) account for some 70-75% of EuropeÕs research output; (iv) the concentration of research in leading departments is substantial but not exclusive; it is comparable in Europe and the US, but leading US departments have incomparably more resources and beneÞt from access to an integrated labour market; (v) few PhD programs are of effcient size, especially in Europe, calling for further concentration; (vi) second-best funding of higher education calls for block grants to effcient programs; in Europe, these should be organised at EU level. I conclude with a mosdest proposal (15 million euros per year) consisting of block grants to leading departments and to young academic researchers. My optimistic verdict is that substantial progress towards the Lisbon goal is at hand, but requires signiÞcant departures from current practices
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE) in its series CORE Discussion Papers with number
2006051.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Alain GILLIS).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)