In this note we show that the solution notion called conservative stable standard of behaviour (CSSB), introduced by Greenberg (1990) has very little predictive power in environments with farsighted players although intuitively it is quite nice. First we show that CSSB can make no prediction at all in a large class of environments that are commonly encountered (like normal form games, social networks etc.), i.e., the entire set of social states is stable with respect to this notion. Next we find that even with some feasibility restrictions on the paths, the set of outcomes stable with respect to CSSB is a superset (some times a strict superset) of the largest consistent set (LCS) in a class of environments that includes voting games with a finite number of outcomes, even though for such environments the LCS itself may contain many intuitively unreasonable outcomes.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE) in its series CORE Discussion Papers with number
2003049.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Alain GILLIS).
Related research
Keywords:
Find related papers by JEL classification: C70 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - General C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Herings, P.J.J. & Mauleon, A. & Vannetelbosch, V.J., 2000.
"Social rationalizability,"
Discussion Paper
81, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Herings,P. Jean-Jacques & Mauleon,Ana & Vannetelbosch,J., 2000.
"Social Rationalizability,"
Research Memoranda
009, Maastricht : METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization.
[Downloadable!]
Herings,P. Jean-Jacques & Mauleon,Ana & Vannetelbosch,J., 2002.
"Social Rationalizability,"
Research Memoranda
009, Maastricht : METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization.
[Downloadable!]
J. J. Herings & A. Mauleon & V. Vannetelbosch, 2000.
"Social Rationalizability,"
THEMA Working Papers
2000-36, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
[Downloadable!]
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)