IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/010678.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Promoción de la Conservación de Bosque Natural de Roble mediante el pago por el Servicio Ambiental de Almacenamiento de Carbono: Un Ejercicio de Optim

Author

Listed:
  • Andrés Camilo Álvarez Espinosa

Abstract

Reducir la deforestación del bosque natural implica conservar la biodiversidad y mantener almacenado el carbono reduciendo las emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero. Los pagos por servicios ambientales -PSA- fortalecerían los mecanismos de regulación directa para la conservación ya que: reflejan el costo de oportunidad de conservar, minimizan costos de transacción, son efectivos al conservar áreas mayores y establecen niveles sostenibles de aprovechamiento forestal. Usando un modelo de optimización dinámica el cual incluye PSA por almacenamiento de carbono en el bosque de roble del corredor Guantiva-La Rusia-Iguaque se encuentra que el área conservada sería 103.426 hectáreas, cifra mayor al área protegida actualmente de 20.089 hectáreas.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrés Camilo Álvarez Espinosa, 2013. "Promoción de la Conservación de Bosque Natural de Roble mediante el pago por el Servicio Ambiental de Almacenamiento de Carbono: Un Ejercicio de Optim," Documentos CEDE 10678, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000089:010678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstream/handle/1992/8381/dcede2013-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pagos por Servicios Ambientales; REDD+; conservación de bosques naturales; optimización dinámica; Quercus humboldtii.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000089:010678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad De Los Andes-Cede (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceandco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.