Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Ley 789 De 2002: ¿Funcionó O No?

Contents:

Author Info

  • Alejandro Gaviria

    ()

Abstract

Este trabajo presenta una evaluación de la Ley 789 de 2002, conocida como la reforma laboral. La evaluación no sólo tiene en cuenta la evidencia indirecta aportada por las encuestas de hogares, sino también la evidencia directa recopilada por una encuesta empresarial diseñada expresamente para medir los efectos de la reforma. El análisis muestra que (i) la reforma tuvo un efecto notable sobre la contratación de aprendices y sobre el subempleo por insuficiencia de horas (especialmente en el sector servicios), (ii) los efectos sobre la generación de empleo y sobre la formalización del empleo fueron inferiores a lo esperado, y (iii) los programas de apoyo al desempleado y de estímulo a la generación de empleo no han funcionado.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://economia.uniandes.edu.co/publicaciones/D2004-45.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES-CEDE in its series DOCUMENTOS CEDE with number 003140.

as in new window
Length: 56
Date of creation: 30 Nov 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:col:000089:003140

Contact details of provider:

Related research

Keywords: reforma laboral;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Valentina Calderón & Ana María Ibáñez, 2005. "Labor Market Effects of Migration-Related Supply Shocks: Evidence from Internally Displaced Populations in Colombia," DOCUMENTOS CEDE 005851, UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES-CEDE.
  2. Juan Carlos Guataquí Roa & Andrés Felipe García-Suaza, 2009. "Efectos de la reforma laboral:¿más trabajo y menos empleos?," ENSAYOS SOBRE POLÍTICA ECONÓMICA, BANCO DE LA REPÚBLICA - ESPE.
  3. Cuesta, Jose & Bohorquez, Camilo, 2011. "Labor market transitions and social security in Colombia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5650, The World Bank.
  4. Roberto Steiner & Irene Clavijo & Natalia Salazar, 2008. "Colombia´s Efforts at Achieving Inclusive and Sustainable Growth: The Road Traveled and the Challenges Ahead," INFORMES DE INVESTIGACIÓN 009058, FEDESARROLLO.
  5. Juan José Echavarría & Enrique López & Sergio Ocampo & Norberto Rodríguez, 2011. "Choques, instituciones laborales y desempleo en Colombia," ENSAYOS SOBRE POLÍTICA ECONÓMICA, BANCO DE LA REPÚBLICA - ESPE.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000089:003140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Universidad De Los Andes-Cede).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.