Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Demand for Environment Goods: Evidence from Voting Patterns on California Initiatives

Contents:

Author Info

  • Khan, M.
  • Matsusaka, J.G.

Abstract

This article studies voting behavior on 16 environmental ballot propositions in California in order to characterize the demand for environmental goods. The environment is found to be a normal good for people with mean incomes, but some environmental goods are inferior for those with high incomes, at least when supplied collectively An important "price" of environmental goods is reduced income in the constructions farming, forestry, and manufacturing industries. Income and price can explain most of the variation in voting; there is little need to introduce preferences variables such as political ideology. Copyright 1997 by the University of Chicago.

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Download Info

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Columbia University, Department of Economics in its series Discussion Papers with number 1995_08.

as in new window
Length: 26 pages
Date of creation: 1995
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:clu:wpaper:1995_08

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 1022 International Affairs Building, 420 West 118th Street, New York, NY 10027
Phone: (212) 854-3680
Fax: (212) 854-8059
Web page: http://www.econ.columbia.edu/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: ENVIRONMENT; DEMAND;

Other versions of this item:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. Vote "No" on California's Proposition 23!
    by Matthew E. Kahn in Environmental and Urban Economics on 2010-06-28 22:19:00
  2. My Three New NBER Papers
    by Matthew Kahn in Environmental and Urban Economics on 2014-03-12 13:11:00
  3. Three New Economics Papers Related to Mitigating Climate Change
    by Matthew E. Kahn in The Reality-Based Community on 2014-03-12 16:20:17
  4. Intellectual Growth
    by Matthew Kahn in Environmental and Urban Economics on 2014-08-01 14:59:00
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clu:wpaper:1995_08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Discussion Paper Coordinator).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.