This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

North-South Trade and the Dynamics of Renewable Resources

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Chichilnisky, G.

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Columbia University, Department of Economics in its series Discussion Papers with number 1993_02.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 37 pages
Date of creation: 1993
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:clu:wpaper:1993_02

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 1022 International Affairs Building, 420 West 118th Street, New York, NY 10027
Phone: (212) 854-3680
Fax: (212) 854-8059
Web page: http://www.econ.columbia.edu/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Discussion Paper Coordinator).

Related research
Keywords: trade ; renewable resources;

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Graciela Chichilnisky & Geoffrey Heal, 1993. "Who Should Abate Carbon Emissions? An International Viewpoint," NBER Working Papers 4425, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  2. Gardner Brown, 2000. "Renewable Natural Resource Management and Use Without Markets," Working Papers 0025, University of Washington, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  3. Chichilnisky, Graciela, 1993. "Traditional comparative advantages vs. economies of scale: NAFTA and GATT," MPRA Paper 8359, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  4. Chichilnisky, Graciela, 1996. "Trade regimes and GATT: resource-intensive vs. knowledge intensive growth," MPRA Paper 8493, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  5. Chichilnisky, Graciela, 1995. "The economic value of the Earth's resources," MPRA Paper 8491, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  6. Chichilnisky, Graciela, 1993. "The abatement of carbon emissions in industrial and developing countries," MPRA Paper 8390, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  7. Chichilnisky, Graciela, 1998. "The knowledge revolution," MPRA Paper 8891, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  8. F. Cabo & E. Escudero & G. Martín-Herrán, 2002. "Towards an ecological technology for global growth in a North-South trade model," Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 15-41, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Larry Karp & Jinhua Zhao & Sandeep Sacheti, 2000. "The Long-Run Effects of Environmental Reform in Open Economies," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series 818, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  10. Chichilnisky, Graciela, 1993. "Property Rights on Biodiversity and the Pharmaceutical Industry," MPRA Paper 8330, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  11. Demeke, Bayou, 2004. "Is Globalization Bad For The Environment? International Trade And Land Degradation In Developing Countries:The Case Of Small Open Economy," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20376, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association). [Downloadable!]
  12. Chichilnisky, Graciela, 1995. "Strategies for trade liberalization in the Americas," MPRA Paper 8393, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  13. Chichilnisky, Graciela & Abraham, Ralph & Record, Ron, 1998. "North-South trade and the dynamics of the environment, Chapter 2.2," MPRA Paper 8818, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  14. Graciela Chichilnisky, 1996. "An axiomatic approach to sustainable development," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 231-257, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  15. Larry Karp & Sandeep Sacheti & Jinhua Zhao, 1999. "Common ground between free-traders and environmentalists," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series 817, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  16. Anriquez, Gustavo, 2002. "Trade And The Environment: An Economic Literature Survey," Working Papers 28598, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics. [Downloadable!]
  17. Bergeron, Nancy, 2002. "International Trade and Conservation with Costly Natural Resource Management," Cahiers de recherche 0204, GREEN. [Downloadable!]
  18. Karp, Larry & Zhao, Jinhua & Sacheti, Sandeep, 1999. "The Uncertain Benefits of Environmental Reform in Open Economies," Staff General Research Papers 4043, Iowa State University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  19. Chichilnisky, Graciela, 1994. "Traditional comparative advantage vs. increasing returns to scale: NAFTA and the GATT," MPRA Paper 8360, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Want to help out with this project? Look for volunteer opportunities.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-16.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.