Extraction of the surplus in standard auctions [revised July 2002]
AbstractCrer and McLean  and McAfee and Reny  showed that, in "nearly all auctions", the seller can offer a mechanism that obtains full rent extraction. Later, Robert  showed that the result fails in the presence of either limited liability or risk aversion. This paper provides yet another reason. It shows that the full rent extraction result fails if the seller is restricted to using auctions where the bidders’ payments to the seller depend on the bids alone. Our interest for this problem is motivated by the fact that both the "standard model of auction" () as well as the most popular auctions display this feature. As a general matter, the proof shows that full rent extraction results fail whenever the mechanism uses only part of the information embodied in a player type.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Columbia University, Department of Economics in its series Discussion Papers with number 0102-73.
Length: 19 pages
Date of creation: 2003
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: 1022 International Affairs Building, 420 West 118th Street, New York, NY 10027
Phone: (212) 854-3680
Fax: (212) 854-8059
Web page: http://www.econ.columbia.edu/
More information through EDIRC
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Discussion Paper Coordinator).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.