IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cla/uclawp/261.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring the Impact of Education on Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Plant

    (UCLA)

  • Finis Welch

    (UCLA)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Plant & Finis Welch, 1982. "Measuring the Impact of Education on Productivity," UCLA Economics Working Papers 261, UCLA Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:cla:uclawp:261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.ucla.edu/workingpapers/wp261.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. W. Jorgenson & Z. Griliches, 1967. "The Explanation of Productivity Change," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 34(3), pages 249-283.
    2. Nelson, Richard R, 1973. "Recent Exercises in Growth Accounting: New Understanding or Dead End?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(3), pages 462-468, June.
    3. Chinloy, Peter T, 1980. "Sources of Quality Change in Labor Input," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(1), pages 108-119, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maki, Wilbur R., 1987. "Education And Economic Growth," Staff Papers 13538, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    2. Allen, Joyce E. & Davis, Carlton G. & Evans, Sidney H. & Huffman, Wallace E. & Jones, Dewitt & Nelson, Mack C. & Park, Alfred L. & Robbins, Richard D., 1986. "Opportunities And Status Of Blacks In The Agricultural Economics Profession," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278435, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kerekes, Monika, 2007. "Analyzing patterns of economic growth: a production frontier approach," Discussion Papers 2007/15, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    2. Frank Gollop & Dale Jorgenson, 1983. "Sectoral Measures of Labor Cost for the United States, 1948-1978," NBER Chapters, in: The Measurement of Labor Cost, pages 185-236, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Kang, Lili & Peng, Fei, 2013. "Growth Accounting Analysis in China 1978-2009," MPRA Paper 50827, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Martin Neil Baily & Charles L. Schultze, 1990. "The Productivity of Capital in a Period of Slower Growth," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 21(1990 Micr), pages 369-420.
    5. Jesus Felipe & Franklin M. Fisher, 2003. "Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists should Know," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2‐3), pages 208-262, May.
    6. Cristiano Antonelli & Francesco Quatraro, 2010. "The effects of biased technological change on total factor productivity: empirical evidence from a sample of OECD countries," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 361-383, August.
    7. Randi Boorstein & Robert C. Feenstra, 1987. "Quality Upgrading and its Welfare Cost in U.S. Steel Imports, 1969-74," NBER Working Papers 2452, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. H Li, 2001. "The Relative Importance Of Effort, Organization, And Technological Change In Chinese Factories," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 19(1), pages 99-108, January.
    9. L.R. Maglen, 1990. "Challenging the Human Capital Orthodoxy: The Education‐Productivity Link Re‐examined," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 66(4), pages 281-294, December.
    10. Kinvi D.A. Logossah, 1994. "Capital humain et croissance économique : une revue de la littérature," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 116(5), pages 17-34.
    11. Jesus Felipe & John S. L. McCombie, 2007. "Is A Theory Of Total Factor Productivity Really Needed?," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 195-229, February.
    12. Binswanger, Hans P., 1972. "Induced Innovation: A Critical Review Of The Theory And Conclusions From New Evidence," Staff Papers 13955, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    13. Charles R. Hulten, 1991. "Introduction to "Productivity Growth in Japan and the United States"," NBER Chapters, in: Productivity Growth in Japan and the United States, pages 1-27, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Fagerberg, Jan, 1988. "Technology, Growth and Trade: Schumpeterian Perspectives," MPRA Paper 59156, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Barnett, William A. & Erwin Diewert, W. & Zellner, Arnold, 2011. "Introduction to measurement with theory," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 161(1), pages 1-5, March.
    16. Santos, João & Domingos, Tiago & Sousa, Tânia & St. Aubyn, Miguel, 2016. "Does a small cost share reflect a negligible role for energy in economic production? Testing for aggregate production functions including capital, labor, and useful exergy through a cointegration-base," MPRA Paper 70850, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Tung Liu & Kui-Wai Li, 2008. "Revisiting Solow’s Decomposition of Economic and Productivity Growth," Working Papers 200805, Ball State University, Department of Economics, revised Dec 2008.
    18. Karl Whelan, 2002. "Computers, Obsolescence, And Productivity," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(3), pages 445-461, August.
    19. de Rassenfosse, Gaétan, 2013. "Do firms face a trade-off between the quantity and the quality of their inventions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1072-1079.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cla:uclawp:261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: David K. Levine (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econ.ucla.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.