Overcoming Ideological Bias in Elections
AbstractWe study a model in which voters choose between two candidates on the basis of both ideology and competence. While the ideology of the candidates is commonly known, voters are imperfectly informed about competence. Voter preferences, however, are such that ideology alone determines voting. When voting is compulsory, the candidate of the majority ideology prevails, and this may not be optimal from a social perspective. However, when voting is voluntary and costly, we show that turnout adjusts endogenously so that the outcome of a large election is always first-best.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by www.najecon.org in its series NajEcon Working Paper Reviews with number 814577000000000498.
Date of creation: 28 Sep 2010
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.najecon.org/
Other versions of this item:
- NEP-ALL-2010-10-09 (All new papers)
- NEP-CDM-2010-10-09 (Collective Decision-Making)
- NEP-POL-2010-10-09 (Positive Political Economics)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Gianmarco León, 2013.
"Turnout, political preferences and information: Experimental evidence from Perú,"
Economics Working Papers
1364, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
- Gianmarco León, 2013. "Turnout, Political Preferences and Information: Experimental Evidence from Peru," Working Papers 691, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics.
- Gabriele Gratton, 2011.
"Pandering, Faith and Electoral Competition,"
2012-22, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
- Revelli, Federico, 2013.
"Tax Limits and Local Democracy,"
Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers
201336, University of Turin.
- Laurent Bouton & Micael Castanheira De Moura & A. Llorente-Saguer, 2012.
"Divided Majority and Information Aggregation: Theory and Experiment,"
ULB Institutional Repository
2013/136800, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Bouton, Laurent & Castanheira, Micael & Llorente-Saguer, Aniol, 2012. "Divided Majority and Information Aggregation: Theory and Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 9234, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Laurent Bouton & Micael Castanheira & Aniol Llorente-Saguer, 2012. "Divided Majority and Information Aggregation: Theory and Experiment," Working Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2012_20, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
- Triossi, Matteo, 2013. "Costly information acquisition. Is it better to toss a coin?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 169-191.
- Gabriele Gratton, 2013.
"Pandering and Electoral Competition,"
2012-22B, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
- Fernanda L L de Leon, 2013. "Adding Ideology to the Equation: New Predictions for Election Results under Compulsory Voting," University of East Anglia Applied and Financial Economics Working Paper Series 044, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
- Roland Hodler & Simon Luechinger & Alois Stutzer, 2012. "The Effects of Voting Costs on the Democratic Process and Public Finances," Working papers 2012/02, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
- Martin Gregor, 2013. "The Optimal Ballot Structure for Double-Member Districts," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp493, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economic Institute, Prague.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (David K. Levine).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.