IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirwor/2020s-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Défis et embûches dans l’évaluation des PPP : Pour un secteur public efficace et efficient

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel Boyer

Abstract

The choice of the mode of realization of large public investment projects, including large infrastructure projects, between the conventional mode (PSC - public sector comparator) and the PPP mode (public-private partnership), involves two major groups of challenges and pitfalls: the evaluation of the investments themselves and the evaluation of "contracts" or more generally of the "governance" PSC vs. PPP in imperfect and incomplete information contexts. Many reports reveal a serious misunderstanding of the economic analysis of the value of a public project. Dans les analyses relatives au choix du mode de réalisation des grands projets d’investissements publics, dont les grands projets d’infrastructure, entre le mode MOP (maîtrise d’ouvrage publique, ou CSP comparateur secteur public, ou mode conventionnel) et le mode PPP (partenariat public-privé), deux grands groupes de défis et embûches nous interpellent : l’évaluation des investissements et l’évaluation des « contrats » ou plus généralement de la « gouvernance » MOP vs. PPP en information imparfaite et incomplète. Nombre de rapports témoignent d’une compréhension profondément déficiente de l’analyse économique de la valeur d’un projet public.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel Boyer, 2020. "Défis et embûches dans l’évaluation des PPP : Pour un secteur public efficace et efficient," CIRANO Working Papers 2020s-25, CIRANO.
    • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2020s-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2020s-25.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2020s-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.