Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Nursing workload measures and case-mix: an investigation of the reliability and validity of nursing workload measures

Contents:

Author Info

  • Sue Jenkins-Clarke
  • Roy Carr-Hill

    () (Centre for Health Economics, The University of York)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The general aim of this one-year project, funded by the Department of Health and in collaboration with CASPE, has been to investigate the relationship between case-mix and nursing workload measures. Specifically, this report focuses on the underlying issue of examining methodologies and instruments used for measuring workload and the assessment of the sensitivity of chosen measures. The relationship between diagnosis and the process of outcome of patient care is also described at the individual patient level and the overall relationship of case-mix and nursing workload is explored at ward level. The rationale for the choice of Nursing Workload Management Systems (NWMs) and the study design adopted to assess the NWMs chosen is described. Thus, data were collected on three wards over a 6-day period to generate workload estimates, actual nursing hours worked, case-mix (DRG) information, and outcome measurement, The intra-system differences described focus on the financial implications of the choice of parameters used to generate workload estimates. Inter-system differences are described in terms of comparison with actual hours worked and the financial implications of over- and under- staffing estimates. Although the correlations between workload estimates are high, there are variations which loosely reflect other known differences between the NWMs. Correlations between workload estimates of over-staffing, per capita hours paid, case-mix and outcome measurement were low, showing that there was little difference between three of the NWMs (FIP, EXCELCARE and SENS) and confirming that the Criteria for Care behaved differently. Analysis at an individual case level was conducted to see whether it was necessary to take account of diagnostic group. This suggested that there was a relationship between the main diagnostic group and the quality and outcome of patient care even after taking into account the strong association between diagnostic group and patient dependency levels, although this relationship disappeared after taking ward effect into account. The overall conclusion reached is that the NWMs reviewed produced inconsistent and unreliable estimates of nursing workload. These estimates also make insufficient allowance for the skill-mix manipulation required to deliver good quality care. Recommendations are made based on these findings.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/occasionalpapers/CHE%20Occasional%20Paper%2017.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1991
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Centre for Health Economics, University of York in its series Working Papers with number 017cheop.

    as in new window
    Length: 138 pages
    Date of creation: Nov 1991
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:chy:respap:17cheop

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: York Y010 5DD
    Phone: (01904) 321401
    Fax: (0)1904 323759
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.york.ac.uk/che
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: case-mix; nursing; workload; skill mix;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chy:respap:17cheop

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Frances Sharp).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.