IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chy/respap/103chedp.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Searching for the Holy Grail in antipodes: the market reform of the New Zealand health care system

Author

Listed:
  • Pim Borren
  • Alan Maynard

    (Centre for Health Economics, The University of York)

Abstract

Throughout the world there is a recognition that the delivery of health care is ineffective and that these unpleasant outcomes are a product of the perverse incentives inherent in all health care systems. In New Zealand the Government documented the defects of the health care system and is now introducing radical reforms in the belief that these will improve the system’s performance. The nature of these reforms, centred on the purchaser-provider divide, us similar to changes introduced in the Netherlands, the UK, Sweden, Israel and Russia. As elsewhere, the New Zealand Government is asserting that their reforms will improve performance and it is reluctant both to take time to design crucial misco economic elements in the new system and pilot the changes which are being imposed in a bold and untested fashion. This Discussion Paper describes the reforms which have been introduced in New Zealand and evaluates them in terms of the eight major problems its Government sought to eradicate by change. The authors argue that instead of mitigating these problems, the reforms may worsen them. There are risks that the system will become fragmented and less equitable. The move away from a single (tax) source of funds (i.e. the single pipe) may make cost control more difficult. The Government is seeking to address the issue of information generation to facilitate market trading but it is not clear how effectiveness and efficiency data will be produced, let alone how it will be used to change procedures policy. The authors agree that many of the problems identified by the New Zealand Government are significant and in need of resolution. However, whilst the political imperative may require immediate action, the economic case for these reforms is quite poor. Incremental change, with careful evaluation, would “confuse” policy reform with facts about the attributes of competing management mechanisms and reward systems. As it is we have the all too familiar combination of political assertions and an unwillingness to measure the impact of change, behaviours which create the causes for the advocacy of the next “redisorganisation” of the health care system within the next five years!

Suggested Citation

  • Pim Borren & Alan Maynard, 1993. "Searching for the Holy Grail in antipodes: the market reform of the New Zealand health care system," Working Papers 103chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
  • Handle: RePEc:chy:respap:103chedp
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/discussionpapers/CHE%20Discussion%20Paper%20103.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1993
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karen Bloor & Alam Maynard & Andrew Street, 1992. "How much is a doctor worth?," Working Papers 098chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    2. Mike Drummond, 1990. "Assessing efficiency in the new National Health Service," Working Papers 075chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    3. Drummond, Michael & Maynard, Alan, 1988. "Efficiency in the National Health Service: lessons from abroad," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 59-74.
    4. John Brazier & John Hutton & Richard Jeavons, 1988. "Reforming the UK health care system: as framework for analysis and a review of some recent proposals," Working Papers 047chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    5. Maynard, Alan, 1993. "Competition in the UK National Health Service: Mission impossible?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 193-204, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Scott, Anthony & Hall, Jane, 1995. "Evaluating the effects of GP remuneration: problems and prospects," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 183-195, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian Ferguson & Stephen Palmer, 1994. "Markets and the NHSME Guidelines: costs and prices in the internal market," Working Papers 120chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    2. Antonia Morga & Ana Xavier, "undated". "Hospital specialists' private practice and its impact on the number of NHS patients treated and on the delay for elective surgery," Discussion Papers 01/01, Department of Economics, University of York.
    3. Karen Bloor & Alan Maynard, 1992. "Rewarding excellence? Consultants' distinction awards and the need for reform," Working Papers 100chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    4. Alan Maynard & Arthur Walker, 1993. "Planning the medical workforce: struggling out of the time warp," Working Papers 105chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    5. Andrew M Jones, 1995. "A microeconometric analysis of smoking in the UK health and lifestyle survey," Working Papers 139chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    6. Ross, Jayne, 1995. "The use of economic evaluation in health care: Australian decision makers' perceptions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 103-110, February.
    7. Maynard, Alan & Bloor, Karen, 1995. "Primary care and health care reform: the need to reflect before reforming," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 171-181, March.
    8. Brian Ferguson & John Posnett, 1994. "Pricing in the NHS internal market," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(3), pages 133-136, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    reform;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chy:respap:103chedp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gill Forder (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chyoruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.