IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chf/rpseri/rp1420.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Are Behavioral Biases Stable Across Markets and Prevalent Across Individuals? Evidence from Individual Betting Choices

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick GAGLIARDINI

    (University of Lugano and Swiss Finance Institute)

  • Christian GOURIEROUX

    (CREST and University of Toronto)

  • Mirco RUBIN

    (University of Lugano and Swiss Finance Institute)

Abstract

In this paper we introduce and study positional portfolio management. In a positional allocation strategy, the manager maximizes an expected utility function written on the cross-sectional rank (position) of the portfolio return. The objective function reflects the goal of the manager to be well ranked among his/her competitors. To implement positional allocation strategies, we specify a nonlinear unobservable factor model for the asset returns. The model disentangles the dynamic of the cross-sectional distribution of the returns and the dynamic of the ranks of the individual assets within the cross-sectional distribution. We estimate the model on a large set of stocks traded in the NYSE, AMEX and NASDAQ markets between 1990/1 and 2009/12, and implement the positional strategies for different investment universes. The positional strategies outperform standard momentum, reversal and mean-variance allocation strategies for most criteria. Moreover, the positional strategies outperform the equally weighted portfolio for criteria based on position.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick GAGLIARDINI & Christian GOURIEROUX & Mirco RUBIN, 2014. "Are Behavioral Biases Stable Across Markets and Prevalent Across Individuals? Evidence from Individual Betting Choices," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 14-20, Swiss Finance Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp1420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2405392
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Positional Good; Robust Portfolio Management; Rank; Factor Model; Big Data; Equally Weighted Portfolio; Momentum; Positional Risk Aversion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp1420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ridima Mittal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fameech.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.