IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chf/rpseri/rp1136.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

We propose a technique to avoid spurious detections of jumps in highfrequency data via an explicit thresholding on available test statistics

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre BAJGROWICZ

    (University of Geneva)

  • Olivier SCAILLET

    (University of Geneva and Swiss Finance Institute)

Abstract

We prove that it eliminates asymptotically all spurious detections. Monte Carlo results show that it performs also well in nite samples. In Dow Jones stocks, spurious detections represent up to 50% of the jumps detected initially between 2006 and 2008. For the majority of stocks, jumps do not cluster in time and no cojump a ects all stocks simultaneously, suggesting jump risk is diversi able. We relate the remaining jumps to macroeconomic news, prescheduled company-speci c announcements, and stories from news agencies which include a variety of unscheduled and uncategarized events. The majority of news do not cause jumps. One exception are share buybacks announcements. Fed rate news have an important impact but rarely cause jumps. Another nding is that 60% of jumps occur without any news event. For one third of the jumps with no news we observe an unusual behavior in the volume of transactions. Hence, liquidity pressures are probably another important factor of jumps.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre BAJGROWICZ & Olivier SCAILLET, 2011. "We propose a technique to avoid spurious detections of jumps in highfrequency data via an explicit thresholding on available test statistics," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 11-36, Swiss Finance Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp1136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1343900
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    jumps; high-frequency data; spurious detections; jumps dynamics; news releases; cojumps;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp1136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ridima Mittal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fameech.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.