Wider participation in stockholding is often presumed to reduce wealth inequality. We measure and decompose changes in US wealth inequality between 1989 and 2001, a period of considerable spread of equity culture. Inequality in equity wealth is found to be important for net wealth inequality, despite equity's limited share. Our findings show that reduced wealth inequality is not a necessary outcome of the spread of equity culture. We estimate contributions of stockholder characteristics to levels and inequality in equity holdings, and we distinguish changes in configuration of the stockholder pool from changes in the influence of given characteristics. Our estimates imply that both the 1989 and the 2001 stockholder pools would have produced higher equity holdings in 1998 than were actually observed for 1998 stockholders. This arises from differences both in optimal holdings and in financial attitudes and practices, suggesting a dilution effect of the boom followed by a cleansing effect of the downturn. Cumulative gains and losses in stockholding are shown to be significantly influenced by length of household investment horizon and portfolio breadth but, controlling for those, use of professional advice is either insignificant or counterproductive.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Center for Financial Studies in its series CFS Working Paper Series with number
2005/20.
Length: 60 pages Date of creation: 20 Jan 2005 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:cfs:cfswop:wp200520
Contact details of provider: Postal: House of Finance, Gr�neburgplatz 1, HPF H5, D-60323 Frankfurt am Main Phone: +49 (0)69 798-30050 Fax: +49 (0)69 798-30077 Email: Web page: http://www.ifk-cfs.de/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Birgit Pässler).
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Michael Haliassos & Alexander Michaelides, 2003.
"Portfolio Choice and Liquidity Constraints,"
International Economic Review,
Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 44(1), pages 143-177, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Luigi Guiso & Tullio Jappelli, 2000.
"Household Portfolios in Italy,"
CSEF Working Papers
43, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
David Laibson & Andrea Repetto & Jeremy Tobacman, 2000.
"A Debt Puzzle,"
Documentos de Trabajo
80, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
David Laibson & Andrea Repetto & Jeremy Tobacman, 2000.
"A Debt Puzzle,"
NBER Working Papers
7879, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Haliassos, Michael & Bertaut, Carol C, 1995.
"Why Do So Few Hold Stocks?,"
Economic Journal,
Royal Economic Society, vol. 105(432), pages 1110-29, September.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
John Heaton & Deborah Lucas, 2000.
"Stock prices and fundamentals,"
Proceedings,
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Apr.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
John Heaton & Deborah Lucas, 2000.
"Stock Prices and Fundamentals,"
NBER Chapters,
in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1999, Volume 14, pages 213-264
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!]
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)