IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_4547.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the Political Economy of Complexity

Author

Listed:
  • Shmuel Nitzan
  • Uriel Procaccia
  • Joseph Tzur

Abstract

A substantial number of regulatory frameworks are commonly viewed by impartial observers as inordinately complex. Is there an explanation for this phenomenon? Employing a partial equilibrium model, this paper approaches the problem of complexity from a political-economy vantage point. It underscores some hitherto unexplored ways in which complexity serves the narrow interests of some market agents and sets up effective barriers to entry to their competitors. These rent-inducing barriers often take the form of rapid and extensive supplements and changes in the regulatory environment, which make it hard for smaller market agents to adjust and maintain their competitive edge. Whereas regulatory schemes are normally conceived as enhancing transparency, and changes in these schemes are usually associated with salutary reformative agendas, this Article underscores the dark side of both phenomena by focusing on the anti-competitive features of regulation and reform and by clarifying the role of complexity in enhancing and preserving the narrow interests of certain market participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Shmuel Nitzan & Uriel Procaccia & Joseph Tzur, 2013. "On the Political Economy of Complexity," CESifo Working Paper Series 4547, CESifo.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp4547.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sacks, Michael, 2021. "Incentives for the over-provision of public goods," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 197-213.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    regulation; barriers to entry; accounting; securities regulation; the market of charters; race to the top; race to the bottom;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.