Political Risk of Social Security: The Case of the Indexation of Benefits in the Czech Republic
AbstractWe contribute to the literature on the political risk of social security by extending Feldstein and Ranguelova's (2001) methodology for measuring risk in a funded pension system to a pay-as-you-go system. We use the methodology to assess the risk over indexation of benefits in the Czech Republic during the 1990's and early 2000's. The government's discretion over indexations creates both aggregate and individual risk and makes the Czech Republic a particulary interesting case to study. Using data on the actual evolution of benefits for people who retired between 1988 and 1995, we find that retirees faced fairly large volatility in the changes in real benefits - while the mean percentage change was 1.2, its standard deviation was 4.3. This volatility reduces the expected utility of retirees by 0.8 to 1.3 percent of equivalent consumption.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economic Institute, Prague in its series CERGE-EI Working Papers with number wp318.
Date of creation: Mar 2007
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: P.O. Box 882, Politickych veznu 7, 111 21 Praha 1
Phone: (+420) 224 005 123
Fax: (+420) 224 005 333
Web page: http://www.cerge-ei.cz
More information through EDIRC
Social security; political risk; pension reform.;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
- D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- John B. Shoven & Sita N. Slavov, 2006. "Political Risk Versus Market Risk in Social Security," NBER Working Papers 12135, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Feldstein, Martin, 2005. "Structural Reform of Social Security," Scholarly Articles 2794830, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Feldstein, Martin & Ranguelova, Elena, 2001. "Individual Risk in an Investment-Based Social Security System," Scholarly Articles 2797440, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Martin Feldstein, 2005.
"Structural Reform of Social Security,"
NBER Working Papers
11098, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- John McHale, 1999.
"The Risk of Social Security Benefit Rule Changes: Some International Evidence,"
NBER Working Papers
7031, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- John McHale, 2001. "The Risk of Social Security Benefit-Rule Changes: Some International Evidence," NBER Chapters, in: Risk Aspects of Investment-Based Social Security Reform, pages 247-290 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Martin Feldstein & Elena Ranguelova, 2001.
"Individual Risk in an Investment-Based Social Security System,"
NBER Working Papers
8074, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Martin Feldstein & Elena Ranguelova, 2001. "Individual Risk in an Investment-Based Social Security System," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(4), pages 1116-1125, September.
- Douglas H. Joines, 2005. "Pareto-Improving Social Security Reform," 2005 Meeting Papers 396, Society for Economic Dynamics.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jana Koudelkova).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.