Overall, collective bargaining coverage has dropped by around fourteen percentage points. This paperinvestigates the causes and consequences of the decline in collective bargaining in Britain between 1990 and1998. One in three workplaces that practiced collective bargaining in 1990 had abandoned it by 1998 and theincidence and coverage of collective bargaining in newer workplaces was lower than in the workplaces theyreplaced. The abandonment of collective bargaining was not associated with an increase in individualisedpayment mechanisms or with the use of 'high involvement' HRM practices. Workplaces that abandonedbargaining reported less impressive productivity gains than other workplaces. Male wage inequality rose as aresult of the decline of bargaining coverage and of weaker unions where collective bargaining remained. Higherlevels of job creation in workplaces that abandoned collective bargaining balance these negative outcomes.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Economic Performance, LSE in its series CEP Discussion Papers with number
dp0705.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
John H. Pencavel, 2004.
"The Surprising Retreat of Union Britain,"
NBER Chapters,
in: Seeking a Premier Economy: The Economic Effects of British Economic Reforms, 1980-2000, pages 181-232
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!]