Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The use of CGE models for the trade policies analysis and their impact on poverty: criticisms and proposals for improvements Model

Contents:

Author Info

  • Jean-Marc Philip

    ()
    (CEDERS, University of Economics, Aix-Marseille II)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    In this paper, we analyze the recourse to CGE modeling for assessing the impact of the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) signed between the European Union and the ACP (Africa-Caribbean-Pacific) countries. This partnership requires the progressive dismantling of the trade barriers against the products originating from the EU and many African countries are worried about its impact on employment a nd ask for a closer examination. . More particularly, it is needed to know whether a wider opening of these countries to liberalism would increase or reduce the poverty level of the less favored households. The debate on this point is all the more difficult because it is not sufficient to look at the GDP growth rate evolution to draw some significant conclusions. A country can present a satisfying GDP growth rate, but can also see the social categories most underprivileged becoming increasingly poor. The CGE models are generally recognized as the best tools to analyze the micro-economic impacts of macro-economic policies and more particularly the trade policies impacts on the poverty. However, to be able to give sufficiently reliable results in order to support decision-making, these models must be based on a robust and coherent data base. Hence, we believe that too much attention is put on the model’s equations and not enough on the SAM elaboration, which is the Achilles’ heel of CGE models. Hence, one of the major actions to carry out in priority would be to require from all the national institutes of statistics to built-up, as a part of their daily activities, a reliable and disaggregated Social Accounting Matrix (SAM), including a relatively fine decomposition of the households. Presently, the Social Accounting Matrix is too often seen as being simply a specific data base, built-up exclusively for the needs of the CGE model, and not as a dashboard for economic deciders that should be constantly monitored and analyzed. As a result, the absence of a reliable and up-to-date Social Accounting Matrix maintained by the national Institutes of Statistics generally reflects a lack of will or transparency from of the national government, as political decisions require to follow closely the evolution of all the socio-economic indicators that are embedded into the Social Accounting Matrix. The normalization of the SAM follow-up process would significantly facilitate a better understanding of the socio-economic consequences of the government policies, such as the trade liberalization, which is presently imposed to the developing countries under the leadership of WTO within a context that is presently more polemic than scientific.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.ceders.org/cdr/megc.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2006
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Aix-Marseille II University, CEDERS in its series Working Paper with number 9602.

    as in new window
    Length: 18 pages
    Date of creation: Mar 2006
    Date of revision: Mar 2006
    Handle: RePEc:cdr:wpaper:9602

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 14, Avenue Jules FERRY, 13621 Aix-en-Provence Cedex
    Phone: 42.33.48.33
    Fax: 42.33.48.29
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.ceders.org
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: CGE; Calculable General Equilibrium Model; GEM; General Equilibrium Model; Trade issues; WTO; Economic Partnership Agreement; CGE modeling; SAM; Social Accounting Matrix;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdr:wpaper:9602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Marc Philip) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Jean-Marc Philip to update the entry or send us the correct address.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.