Do Transportation and Communications Tend to Be Substitutes, Complements, or Neither? U.S. Consumer Expenditures Perspective, 1984â€“2002
AbstractWith aggregate data from the U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey for 19 years, 1984 through 2002, this study analyzes relationships between expenditures on transportation and communications. Several classification schemes for expenditure categories were used, from the most aggregate [two categories (transportation and communications)] to the most disaggregate [nine transportation categories (new vehicle purchases, used vehicle purchases, vehicle finance charges, gasoline and motor oil, vehicle maintenance and repairs, vehicle insurance, public transportation, out-of-town lodging, and other entertainment including bikes and recreational vehicles) and five communications categories (telephone service; miscellaneous household equipment including phones and computers; television, radio, and sound equipment; postage and stationery; and reading)]. Aggregate demand system modeling (in particular, the linear approximate almost ideal demand system) was then used to determine the relationships between expenditures on transportation and those on communications, again for several different classifications. The model results indicate that transportation and communications categories have substitution and complementarity relationships, often not symmetric. However, a dominant effect of complementarity can be found in the influence of communications on transportation.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University of California Transportation Center in its series University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers with number qt8124w02n.
Date of creation: 01 Dec 2008
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: 109 McLaughlin Hall, Mail Code 1720, Berkeley, CA 94720-1720
Web page: http://www.escholarship.org/repec/uctc/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Choo, Sangho & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2007.
"Telecommunications and travel demand and supply: Aggregate structural equation models for the US,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier,
Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 4-18, January.
- Choo, Sangho & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2008. "Telecommunications and travel demand and supply: Aggregate structural equation models for the US," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers, University of California Transportation Center qt6q8518s4, University of California Transportation Center.
- Lee, Taihyeong & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2004.
"An Input-Output Analysis of the Relationships between Communications and Travel for Industry,"
Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis
qt09n3d2k1, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
- Lee, Taihyeong & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2004. "An Input-Output Analysis of the Relationships Between Communications and Travel for Industry," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers, University of California Transportation Center qt55x4h2r2, University of California Transportation Center.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lisa Schiff).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.