IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt28130050.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L.A. Story: A Reality Check for Transit-Based Housing

Author

Listed:
  • Boarnet, Marlon
  • Crane, Randall

Abstract

An increasingly influential planning strategy for leveraging rail transit is high-density residential development near rail stations, or 'Transit-Based Housing'. Proponents argue such projects will get more people onto trains, reduce developers' expenses, and lower commuting costs, housing prices, and air pollution in the bargain. While most of the literature has addressed the merit of such projects, this paper considers a separate question: Whatever virtues transit-based housing may have, what are its prospects? We find that transit-based housing faces a much steeper uphill battle than the conventional wisdom suggests. Cities' parochial fiscal and economic interests appear to conflict with transit-based housing in several fundamental respects, a view strongly supported by a behavioral analysis of zoning data for all 232 existing and proposed Southern California rail transit stations. Municipalities behave as if they prefer to use rail transit stations for economic rather than residential development, suggesting that transit oriented planning strategies would profit form more attention to their local fiscal and economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Boarnet, Marlon & Crane, Randall, 1995. "L.A. Story: A Reality Check for Transit-Based Housing," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt28130050, University of California Transportation Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt28130050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/28130050.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wachs, Martin, 1993. "Learning from Los Angeles: Transport, Urban Form, and Air Quality," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2wv0h7rq, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Cervero, Robert & Bernick, Michael & Gilbert, Jill, 1994. "Market Opportunities and Barriers to Transit-Based Development in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2c01z5hw, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boarnet, Marlon G. & Compin, Nicholas S., 1996. "Transit-Oriented Development in San Diego County: Incrementally Implementing a Comprehensive Idea," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt52v7c5rr, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Jianling Li & Martin Wachs, 2000. "A test of inter-modal performance measures for transit investment decisions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 243-267, June.
    3. Guerra, Erick Strom, 2013. "The New Suburbs: Evolving travel behavior, the built environment, and subway investments in Mexico City," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt88t7k9p5, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Guerra, Erick Strom, 2013. "The New Suburbs: Evolving travel behavior, the built environment, and subway investment in Mexico City," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4hf3b46g, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Crane, Randall, 1995. "On Form Versus Function: Will the "New Urbanism" Reduce Traffic or Increase It?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7bj9g6bg, University of California Transportation Center.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles Raux, 1996. "Réduire ou repenser la mobilité urbaine quotidienne ?," Post-Print halshs-01735734, HAL.
    2. Edwards, Marion & Mackett, Roger L, 1996. "Developing new urban public transport systems : An irrational decision-making process," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 225-239, October.
    3. Sangeetha Ann & Meilan Jiang & Ghasak Ibrahim Mothafer & Toshiyuki Yamamoto, 2019. "Examination on the Influence Area of Transit-Oriented Development: Considering Multimodal Accessibility in New Delhi, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Cervero, Robert & Bosselmann, Peter, 1994. "An Evaluation of the Market Potential for Transit-Oriented Development Using Visual Simulation Techniques," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8qf9116b, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Lee, R. W. & Rivasplata, C. R., 2001. "Metropolitan transportation planning in the 1990s: comparisons and contrasts in New Zealand, Chile and California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 47-61, January.
    6. Hensher, David A., 1998. "The imbalance between car and public transport use in urban Australia: why does it exist?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 193-204, October.
    7. García Castro, David & Elizagarate Gutiérrez, Victoria & Letamendia Galdós, Iñaki & Kazak, Jan, 2014. "Hiriguneko garraio publiko sistemaren eragina hirien bizi kalitatearen hautematean. City marketinaren ikuspuntutik hausnarketa," Revista de Dirección y Administración de Empresas, Universidad del País Vasco - Escuela Universitaria de Estudios Empresariales de San Sebastián.
    8. Hensher, David A., 2007. "Bus transport: Economics, policy and planning," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 1-507, January.
    9. Antti Talvitie, 2006. "Experiential Incrementalism: On the Theory and Technique to Implement Transport Plans and Policies," Transportation, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 83-110, January.
    10. Pucher, John, 1995. "The road to ruin? : Impacts of economic shock therapy on urban transport in Poland," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 5-13, January.
    11. Krygsman, Stephan & Dijst, Martin & Arentze, Theo, 2004. "Multimodal public transport: an analysis of travel time elements and the interconnectivity ratio," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 265-275, July.
    12. Boarnet, Marlon G. & Compin, Nicholas S., 1996. "Transit-Oriented Development in San Diego County: Incrementally Implementing a Comprehensive Idea," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt52v7c5rr, University of California Transportation Center.
    13. Sangeetha Ann & Meilan Jiang & Toshiyuki Yamamoto, 2019. "Influence Area of Transit-Oriented Development for Individual Delhi Metro Stations Considering Multimodal Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-23, August.
    14. Crane, Randall & Crepeau, Richard, 1998. "Does Neighborhood Design Influence Travel?: Behavioral Analysis of Travel Diary and GIS Data," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4pj4s7t8, University of California Transportation Center.
    15. Pierre Filion & Trudi Bunting & Keith Warriner, 1999. "The Entrenchment of Urban Dispersion: Residential Preferences and Location Patterns in the Dispersed City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(8), pages 1317-1347, July.
    16. Schweitzer, Lisa A., 2003. "The Urban Oasis: Guideways and Greenways in the Human Environment.: Roxanne Warren. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing Group, P.O. Box 182604, Columbus, OH 43272-3031, USA, 1998. 196 pp. ISBN 0-07068," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 186-188, February.
    17. Eran Ben-Elia & Daniel Shefer & Yoram Shiftan, 2003. "Transportation Impact Statement (TIS)—A New Tool for Transportation and Land-Use Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(12), pages 2177-2190, December.
    18. Crane, Randall, 1994. "Cars and Drivers in the New Suburbs: Linking Access to Travel in Neotraditional Planning," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4pw639bw, University of California Transportation Center.
    19. Cervero, Robert & Round, Alfred & Goldman, Todd & Wu, Kang-Li, 1995. "Rail Access Modes and Catchment Areas for the BART System," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt07k76097, University of California Transportation Center.
    20. Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris & Harrison Higgins & Dana Cuff & Dan Oprea, 2013. "Up in the Air: Urban Design for Light Rail Transit Stations in Highway Medians," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 313-339, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt28130050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.