IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/ucsdec/qt253553nn.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why is there Money? Convergence to a Monetary Equilibrium in a General Equilibrium Model with Transaction Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Starr, Ross M.

Abstract

This paper presents a class of examples where a nonmonetary economy converges in a tatonnement process to a monetary equilibrium. Exchange takes place in organized markets characterized by an array of trading posts where each pair of goods may be traded for one another. A barter equilibrium with m commodities is characterized by m(m-1)/2 commodity pair trading posts, most of which host active trade. A monetary equilibrium with unique money is characterized by active trade concentrated on m-1 posts, those trading in 'money' versus the m-1 nonmonetary commodities. There are two distinct sources of monetization: absence of double coincidence of wants and scale economies in transaction costs. As households discover that some pairwise markets (those dealing in the 'natural' money or those with high trading volumes) have lower transaction costs, they restructure their trades to take advantage of the low cost. Use of media of exchange arises endogenously from their low transaction cost. Uniqueness of the medium of exchange in equilibrium results from scale economies in the transaction technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Starr, Ross M., 1999. "Why is there Money? Convergence to a Monetary Equilibrium in a General Equilibrium Model with Transaction Costs," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt253553nn, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:ucsdec:qt253553nn
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/253553nn.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meenakshi Rajeev, 1999. "Markeless Set-Up vs Trading Posts : A Comparative Analysis," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 53, pages 197-211.
    2. Chichilnisky,Graciela (ed.), 1999. "Markets, Information and Uncertainty," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521553551.
    3. Ostroy, Joseph M & Starr, Ross M, 1974. "Money and the Decentralization of Exchange," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 42(6), pages 1093-1113, November.
    4. Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro & Wright, Randall, 1989. "On Money as a Medium of Exchange," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(4), pages 927-954, August.
    5. Clower, Robert W, 1995. "On the Origin of Monetary Exchange," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 33(4), pages 525-536, October.
    6. Hahn, F H, 1971. "Equilibrium with Transaction Costs," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 39(3), pages 417-439, May.
    7. Abhijit V. Banerjee & Eric S. Maskin, 1996. "A Walrasian Theory of Money and Barter," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 111(4), pages 955-1005.
    8. Li, Yiting & Wright, Randall, 1998. "Government Transaction Policy, Media of Exchange, and Prices," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 290-313, August.
    9. Ostroy, Joseph M. & Starr, Ross M., 1990. "The transactions role of money," Handbook of Monetary Economics, in: B. M. Friedman & F. H. Hahn (ed.), Handbook of Monetary Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 1, pages 3-62, Elsevier.
    10. Foley, Duncan K., 1970. "Economic equilibrium with costly marketing," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 276-291, September.
    11. David Starrett, 1973. "Inefficiency and the Demand for "Money" in a Sequence Economy," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 40(4), pages 437-448.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Al-Jarhi, Mabid, 2002. "Macroeconomics: an Islamic Perspective," MPRA Paper 66938, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2004.
    2. Christian Hellwig, 2002. "Money, Intermediaries, and Cash-in-Advance Constraints (February 2003)," UCLA Economics Online Papers 207, UCLA Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Starr, Ross M., 2002. "Existence of Uniqueness of "Money" in General Equilibrium: Natural Monopoly in the Most Liquid Asset," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt660465rm, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    2. Ross Starr, 2000. "Why is there Money? Convergence to a Monetary Equilibrium in a General Equilibrium Model with Transaction Costs," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0058, Econometric Society.
    3. Starr, Ross M., 2001. "Why Is There Money? Endogenous Derivation of "Money" as the Most Liquid Asset: A Class of Examples," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt2rt3k4r7, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    4. Ross M. Starr, 2012. "Why is there Money?," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13763.
    5. Starr, Ross M., 2000. "Why is there Money? Endogenous Derivation of "Money" as the Most Liquid Asset: A Class of Examples," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt9bm927sh, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    6. Starr, Ross M., 2003. "Monetary general equilibrium with transaction costs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3-4), pages 335-354, June.
    7. Dubey, Pradeep & Sahi, Siddhartha & Shubik, Martin, 2018. "Money as minimal complexity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 432-451.
    8. Dubey, Pradeep & Sahi, Siddhartha & Shubik, Martin, 2018. "Graphical exchange mechanisms," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 452-465.
    9. Pradeep Dubey & Siddhartha Sahi & Martin Shubik, 2014. "Minimally complex exchange mechanisms: Emergence of prices, markets, and money," Department of Economics Working Papers 14-01, Stony Brook University, Department of Economics.
    10. Starr, Ross M., 1998. "Monetizing Trade: A Tatonnement Example," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt4mz6w2j1, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    11. Starr, Ross M., 2002. "Monetary General Equilibrium With Transaction Costs," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt9bd8861b, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    12. Starr, Ross M., 2002. "Monetary General Equilibrium with Transaction Costs," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt5w31m72w, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    13. Rajeev, Meenakshi, 2012. "Search cost, trading strategies and optimal market structure," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 1757-1765.
    14. Yener Gök, Zeynep, 2018. "Yeni Parasalcılık: Bir Yazın Taraması [New Monetarism: A Survey Of The Literature]," MPRA Paper 88349, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Starr, Ross M., 2006. "Commodity Money Equilibrium in a Walrasian Trading Post Model: An Example," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt3267p6wj, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    16. Ed Nosal & Guillaume Rocheteau, 2006. "The economics of payments," Policy Discussion Papers, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, issue Feb.
    17. Starr, Ross M., 2014. "Liquidity Creates Money and Debt: An Intertemporal Linear Trading Post Model," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt1vk1k4fm, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    18. Starr, Ross M., 2014. "Liquidity Creates Money and Debt: An Intertemporal Linear Trading Post Model," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt90g2070h, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    19. Starr, Ross M, 2005. "Commodity Money Equilibrium in a Walrasian Trading Post Model: An Elementary Example," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt1200q2z3, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    20. Gilányi, Zsolt, 2008. "Az uralkodó pénzelmélet alapproblémái - a készpénzfedezeti korlátok problémájáról [Underlying problems with the current theory of money - the problem of cash-cover limits]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 136-148.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    exchange;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:ucsdec:qt253553nn. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deucsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.