IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt9x60h1nt.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Report of Field Site Visit District 3, Sacramento Interstate 5, PM 17.2-17.9 RAC-O Overlay

Author

Listed:
  • Ongel, Aybike
  • Santero, Nicholas J
  • Harvey, John T

Abstract

Route 5 near the Florin Road overcrossing (PM 17.2/17.9) in Sacramento County is one of the eight quiet pavement test sections where traffic noise measurements are being conducted by the Caltrans Division of Environmental Analysis Team. This section is a rubberized asphalt concrete open graded (RAC-O) overlay of PCC built in summer 2004. According to a slide in a PowerPoint presentation prepared by Caltrans Environmental (Figure 1), noise measurements were conducted on the section by Caltrans Environmental between approximately Station 55+40 and Station 60+80 on the southbound lanes and between Station 54+40 and Station 59+60 on the northbound lanes. According to the presentation sent to the Pavement Research Center (PRC) by Caltrans Environmental (Figure 1), both the northbound and southbound directions were divided into three segments of roughly equal lengths (exact stationing of measurements cannot be read from the presentation) and noise levels were obtained for each segment. The total distance over which noise measurements were made for each direction, as approximately read from the presentation, are shown in Figure 2 against the total length of the project. Measurements were repeated three times for each segment to account for measurement errors. According to the presentation, the segments are separated by gaps. According to the noise levels reported by Caltrans Environmental, noise performance differences exist within the southbound segments as well as between the northbound and southbound directions, though the mix designs of all the segments were the same. Caltrans Environmental reported the following results: * On the northbound direction, the variation among segments was as small as the difference between run-to-to run. * On the southbound direction, run-to-run differences for each sample segment were smaller than the differences between the segments, indicating that differences were related to variation in the pavement condition of each segment rather than measurement techniques. * Over the project, as much as 3.5-dB variation in noise levels was measured for averages of six different pavement sections. Noise performance differences were significant at lower frequencies (1250 Hz and below). * The overall noise level of the northbound pavement is on average higher than southbound. PRC evaluation of the results presented in the Caltrans Environmental presentation (Figures 3 and 4) indicate that the maximum difference within the southbound direction is about 3.5 dB, and the difference between the average north and southbound directions is less than 1.5 dB. Verbal communication with Caltrans Environmental indicated that all sound intensity measurements were taken in the outside lane. On January 26, 2005, a team from the PRC performed a field survey of the project with the following objectives: * Investigate visual differences in surface condition between northbound and southbound directions * Investigate visual differences in surface condition of different segments of southbound direction where the noise measurements were taken, * Locate any distresses on both directions It was raining during the visit, which enabled the water handling ability of the pavement to be observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ongel, Aybike & Santero, Nicholas J & Harvey, John T, 2005. "Report of Field Site Visit District 3, Sacramento Interstate 5, PM 17.2-17.9 RAC-O Overlay," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9x60h1nt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt9x60h1nt
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9x60h1nt.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering; UCPRC-TM-2005-07;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt9x60h1nt. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.