IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt95g2v3dz.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Carlink II: Research Approach and Early Findings

Author

Listed:
  • Shaheen, Susan

Abstract

CarLink II is a commuter-based carsharing pilot project administered by the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Davis (ITS-Davis) in conjunction with Caltrans, American Honda Motor Company, and Caltrain. Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH) researchers are conducting the evaluation. Launched in Summer 2001, CarLink II continues the investigation of commuter-based carsharing that was originally explored in the 1998 CarLink longitudinal survey (Shaheen, 1999) and the 1999 CarLink I field test (Shaheen et al., 2000). Lessons learned during the CarLink I field test helped guide the project team’s design of the CarLink II project, resulting in several differences and improvements. The original CarLink I field test ran from January to November, 1999 and featured 54 individuals sharing 12 natural gas powered Honda Civics. The vehicles were based at the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station in Dublin/Pleasanton, the eastern terminus of the BART system. The shared cars were equipped with smart technologies including tracking, communication, and reservation systems to facilitate access and logistics. The model incorporated transit-based carsharing for traditional and reverse commute travel patterns, as well as a day-use fleet application, tested at a major employment centerthe Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL).

Suggested Citation

  • Shaheen, Susan, 2004. "Carlink II: Research Approach and Early Findings," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt95g2v3dz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt95g2v3dz
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/95g2v3dz.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sean Doherty & Eric Miller, 2000. "A computerized household activity scheduling survey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 75-97, February.
    2. Shaheen, Susan A., 1999. "Dynamics in Behavioral Adaptation to a Transportation Innovation: A Case Study of Carlink-A Smart Carsharing System," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9w53q5xq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Shaheen, Susan & Wright, John & Dick, David & Novick, Linda, 2000. "Carlink-A Smart Carsharing System Field Test Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3q69g29p, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shaheen, Susan A. & Wright, John, 2001. "Research Approach and Early Findings," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8f8803dx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Shaheen, Susan & Novick, Linda, 2004. "A Framework for Testing Innovative Transportation Solutions: A Case Study of Carlink—A Commuter Carsharing Program," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9t73b6kd, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Susan Shaheen & Nelson Chan & Helen Micheaux, 2015. "One-way carsharing’s evolution and operator perspectives from the Americas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 519-536, May.
    4. Shaheen, Susan, 2004. "A Framework for Testing Innovative Transportation Solutions: A Case Study of CarLink--A Commuter Carhsaring Program," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt47v3b4fd, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    5. Shaheen, Susan A & Novick, Linda, 2005. "Framework for Testing Innovative Transportation Solutions: Case Study of Carlink, a Commuter Carsharing Program," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt056768ks, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Shaheen, Susan & Wright, John & Sperling, Daniel, 2001. "California's Zero Emission Vehicle Mandate - Linking Clean Fuel Cars, Carsharing, and Station Car Strategies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt447386zj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    7. Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline & Eaken, Amanda, 2005. "Improving California’s Bay Area Rapid Transit District Connectivity and Access with Segway Human Transporter and Other Low-Speed Mobility Devices," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9ps1910t, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    8. Shaheen, Susan A. & Wipyewski, Kamill, 2003. "Applying Integrated ITS Technologies to Carsharing System Management: A Carlink Case Study," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7cg2z1b5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Cano, Lauren & Camel, Madonna, 2015. "Exploring Electric Vehicle Carsharing As A Mobility Option for Older Adults:A Case Study of A Senior Adult Community in The San Francisco Bay Area," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0cz5s74s, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Shaheen, Susan & Wright, John & Sperling, Daniel, 2001. "California's Zero Emission Vehicle Mandate - Linking Clean Fuel Cars, Carsharing, and Station Car Strategies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt447386zj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    11. Rodier, Caroline & Shaheen, Susan A. & Chung, Stephanie, 2003. "Unsafe at Any Speed?: What the Literature Says about Low-Speed Modes," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt20r8n5hj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    12. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Chan, Nelson, 2014. "Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5tc324v0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    13. Shaheen, Susan A & Wright, John & Sperling, Daniel, 2002. "California's Zero-Emission Vehicle Mandate: Linking Clean-Fuel Cars, Carsharing, and Station Car Strategies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7n88952b, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    14. Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline J. & Eaken, Amanda M., 2004. "Improving Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District Connectivity and Access with the Segway Human Transporter and Other Low-Speed Mobility Devices," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0z09g3kg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    15. Shaheen, Susan A & Rodier, Caroline J, 2005. "Travel Effects of a Suburban Commuter Carsharing Service: CarLink Case Study," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt61346539, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    16. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Bansal, Apaar & Chan, Nelson & Cohen, Adam, 2017. "Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Industry Developments and Early Understanding of Impacts," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt96j5r729, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    17. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Chan, Nelson, 2016. "Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Potential to Overcome First- and Last-Mile Public Transit Connections," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8042k3d7, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    18. Lee-Gosselin, Martin & Miranda-Moreno, Luis F., 2009. "What is different about urban activities of those with access to ICTs? Some early evidence from Québec, Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 104-114.
    19. Xuan Liu & John M. Usher, 2016. "Modeling air passengers’ rescheduling strategies for airport service lines based on an empirical study with the aid of a virtual 3-D computer graphic environment," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 57-84, March.
    20. Luis Miranda-Moreno & Martin Lee-Gosselin, 2008. "A week in the life of baby boomers: how do they see the spatial–temporal organization of their activities and travel?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 629-653, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt95g2v3dz. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.