IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt8h1969p9.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Enhanced Transit Strategies: Bus Lanes with Intermittent Priority and ITS Technology Architectures for TOD Enhancement

Author

Listed:
  • Todd, Michael

Abstract

Due to increases in congestion, transportation costs, and associated environmental impacts, a variety of new enhanced transit strategies are being investigated worldwide. The transit-oriented development (TOD) concept is a key area where several enhanced transit strategies can be implemented. TODs integrate transit, residential, retail and/or commercial entities into a compact, pedestrian-friendly community, thereby reducing private car usage and increasing transit use. This research report addresses two enhanced strategies within the TOD framework: 1) using Bus Lanes with Intermittent Priorities (BLIPs) to enhance bus transit; and 2) addressing how and what Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) technology can be used within TOD system architectures. With respect to 1), it has been shown that the implementation of BLIPs for bus rapid transit can greatly increase system efficiencies without compromising the level of service for other facility users. The basic analysis in this report shows that both conservative and liberal approaches have similar impacts to traffic and identical benefits. The macroscopic analysis illustrates that traffic disturbances caused by BLIP activation will not slow down subsequent buses, and that roads with medium traffic demand can easily support a BLIP implementation. The microscopic analysis provides some quantitative equations that can help decision makers determine whether a given intersection can be outfitted with a BLIP implementation within predefined parameters. A framework for cost-benefit analysis was provided for BLIP implementation. With respect to 2), it has been shown that transportation efficiency and effectiveness within a TOD can certainly be enhanced with the integration of ITS technology. This project report has identified technology bundles and architectures that have the greatest potential for increasing mobility. Further, it has demonstrated that ITS technologies implemented in a well-integrated fashion will promote transit efficiency and convenience and lead to transit usage beyond levels currently observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Todd, Michael, 2006. "Enhanced Transit Strategies: Bus Lanes with Intermittent Priority and ITS Technology Architectures for TOD Enhancement," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8h1969p9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8h1969p9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8h1969p9.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaheen, Susan & Sperling, Daniel & Wagner, Conrad, 1998. "Carsharing in Europe and North American: Past, Present, and Future," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4gx4m05b, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Shaheen, Susan & Cohen, Adam P. & Roberts, J. Darius, 2005. "Carsharing In North America: Market Growth, Current Developments, And Future Potential," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4h62q7mg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Lee, Duke, 2001. "Wireless Token Ring Protocol," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt316112zf, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Rodier, Caroline J & Shaheen, Susan A & Eaken, Amanda M, 2005. "Transit-Based Smart Parking in the San Francisco Bay Area, California: Assessment of User Demand and Behavioral Effects," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3kw2x3x8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Rodier, Caroline J. & Shaheen, Susan & Novick, Linda, 2004. "Improving Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) district Connectivity and Access with the Segway Human Transporter and other Low Speed Mobility Devices," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6x0767zk, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    6. Shaheen, Susan, 2002. "Shared-Use Vehicle Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8m2060r1, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Shaheen, Susan, 2005. "Smart Parking Management Field Test: A Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District Parking Demonstration," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6d58554x, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    8. Shaheen, Susan, 2002. "Shared-Use Vehicle Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8m2060r1, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Rodier, Caroline J. & Shaheen, Susan A. & Novick, Linda, 2004. "Improving Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District Connectivity and Access with the Segway Human Transporter and Other Low Speed Mobility Devices," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7486s65s, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline J. & Eaken, Amanda M., 2004. "Improving Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District Connectivity and Access with the Segway Human Transporter and Other Low-Speed Mobility Devices," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0z09g3kg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    11. Shaheen, Susan & Wright, John & Dick, David & Novick, Linda, 2000. "Carlink-A Smart Carsharing System Field Test Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3q69g29p, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas Chiabaut & Anais Barcet, 2019. "Demonstration and evaluation of an intermittent bus lane strategy," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 443-456, October.
    2. Dingxin Wu & Wei Deng & Yan Song & Jian Wang & Dewen Kong, 2017. "Evaluating Operational Effects of Bus Lane with Intermittent Priority under Connected Vehicle Environments," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-13, April.
    3. Nima Dadashzadeh & Murat Ergun, 2018. "Spatial bus priority schemes, implementation challenges and needs: an overview and directions for future studies," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 545-570, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barth, Matthew & Shaheen, Susan A & Fukuda, Tuenjai & Fukuda, Atsushi, 2006. "Carsharing and Station Cars in Asia: Overview of Japan and Singapore," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2162b2zt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Barth, Matthew & Shaheen, Susan & Fukuda, Tuenjai & Fukuda, Atsushi, 2005. "Carsharing and Station Cars in Asia: An Overview of Japan and Singapore," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4qw379rx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Shaheen, Susan & Wright, John & Sperling, Daniel, 2001. "California's Zero Emission Vehicle Mandate - Linking Clean Fuel Cars, Carsharing, and Station Car Strategies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt447386zj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Lipman, Timothy & Shaheen, Susan, 2005. "Integrated Hydrogen and Intelligent Transportation Systems Evaluation for the California Department of Transportation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt63d0t5wb, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    5. Barth, Matthew & Todd, Michael & Shaheen, Susan, 2003. "Intelligent Transportation Technology Elements and Operational Methodologies for Shared-Use Vehicle Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6x12h9sk, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Shaheen, Susan & Wright, John & Sperling, Daniel, 2001. "California's Zero Emission Vehicle Mandate - Linking Clean Fuel Cars, Carsharing, and Station Car Strategies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt447386zj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Barth, Matthew & Shaheen, Susan & Fukuda, Tuenjai & Fukuda, Atsushi, 2005. "Carsharing and Station Cars in Asia: An Overview of Japan and Singapore," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt70c4c1v8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    8. Barth, Matthew & Todd, Michael & Shaheen, Susan, 2003. "Intelligent Transportation Technology Elements and Operational Methodologies for Shared-Use Vehicle Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8gg5b8tp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    9. Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline J. & Eaken, Amanda M., 2004. "Improving Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District Connectivity and Access with the Segway Human Transporter and Other Low-Speed Mobility Devices," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0z09g3kg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    10. Golalikhani, Masoud & Oliveira, Beatriz Brito & Carravilla, Maria Antónia & Oliveira, José Fernando & Antunes, António Pais, 2021. "Carsharing: A review of academic literature and business practices toward an integrated decision-support framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    11. Nair, Rahul & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2014. "Equilibrium network design of shared-vehicle systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 47-61.
    12. Philipp Ströhle & Christoph M. Flath & Johannes Gärttner, 2019. "Leveraging Customer Flexibility for Car-Sharing Fleet Optimization," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 42-61, February.
    13. Rodier, Caroline J. & Shaheen, Susan, 2008. "Low-Speed Modes Linked to Public Transit Field Test Results," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6dv0v3qg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Shaheen, Susan A. & Meyn, Mollyanne & Wipyewski, Kamill, 2003. "U.S. Shared-use Vehicle Survey Findings: Opportunities and Obstacles for Carsharing and Station Car Growth," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt69x684m2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    15. Rahul Nair & Elise Miller-Hooks, 2016. "Equilibrium design of bicycle sharing systems: the case of Washington D.C," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(3), pages 321-344, August.
    16. Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline J., 2008. "EasyConnect: Low-Speed Modes Linked to Transit Planning Project," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4w92s6nj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    17. Rahul Nair & Elise Miller-Hooks, 2011. "Fleet Management for Vehicle Sharing Operations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 524-540, November.
    18. Kent, Jennifer L. & Dowling, Robyn, 2013. "Puncturing automobility? Carsharing practices," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 86-92.
    19. Rodier, Caroline & Shaheen, Susan A. & Chung, Stephanie, 2003. "Unsafe at Any Speed?: What the Literature Says about Low-Speed Modes," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt20r8n5hj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    20. Stillwater, Tai & Mokhtarian, Patricia L & Shaheen, Susan A, 2009. "Carsharing and the Built Environment," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6dw9d79z, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    UCD-ITS-RR-06-24; Engineering;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8h1969p9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.