IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt6956k049.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Construction and Test Results on Dowel Bar Retrofit HVS Test Sections 556FD, 557FD, 558FD, and 559FD: State Route 14, Los Angeles County at Palmdale

Author

Listed:
  • Bian, Yi
  • Harvey, John T
  • Ali, Abdikarim

Abstract

This report presents the results of construction, Heavy Vehicle Simulator (HVS) tests, deflection tests, post-HVS forensic testing, and analysis on dowel bar retrofitted (DBR) concrete pavement test sections at Palmdale, California. This project was originally proposed in 2000 by the Caltrans Headquarters Division of Design. Benefits expected from this research are to provide Caltrans with information about design and construction of DBR to help determine where DBR may be a cost-effective strategy for rehabilitating rigid pavement and to help obtain best performance where DBR is selected as the preferred rehabilitation strategy. HVS Tests: Pavement sections include retrofitted joints and transverse cracks with three and four epoxy-coated steel dowels, four hollow stainless steel dowels, and four fiber-reinforced polymer dowels per wheelpath. HVS and FWD results at Palmdale also are compared with the results from previous HVS testing. HVS testing showed that joint performance with four epoxy-coated steel dowels was generally the best of all the sections in terms of load transfer efficiency (LTE) and joint deflection. Three dowels per wheelpath was substantially worse than the other test sections that had four dowels per wheelpath in terms of load transfer efficiency (LTE), however, it was substantially better than before DBR. Joint deflections were substantially better for four epoxy-coated steel dowels per wheelpath than for the other sections. HVS results show that for each of the DBR alternatives, LTE was not substantially affected by heavy HVS loading and that the slabs failed by fatigue cracking before LTE dropped substantially. FWD Tests: The primary performance criteria are LTE and vertical deflection of the joints. Larger joint vertical deflections and lower LTE are strongly correlated with increased rate of faulting and roughness development. FWD deflection measurements agree with those under HVS wheel loading, showing that LTE was substantially improved by DBR and was not substantially affected by HVS trafficking. Results are presented showing sensitivity of deflections and LTE to dowel type, number of dowels per wheelpath, and slab temperature based on FWD measurements. Construction and materials: Observations about DBR construction and materials presented indicate variability in depth of dowel bar placement, overall good condition of the slots and grout, and test results showing that the grout met Caltrans specifications for flexural and compressive strength.

Suggested Citation

  • Bian, Yi & Harvey, John T & Ali, Abdikarim, 2008. "Construction and Test Results on Dowel Bar Retrofit HVS Test Sections 556FD, 557FD, 558FD, and 559FD: State Route 14, Los Angeles County at Palmdale," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6956k049, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt6956k049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6956k049.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    UCD-ITS-RP-08-29; Engineering;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt6956k049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.